Globalism is OVER.
Are You Paying Attention Yet?
Is Trump different? For the first time at least 50 years a US president has articulated clearly and acted decisively to end the planned, or as the CFR termed it in 1973, “the Controlled Disintegration” of the United States. Secretary of State Marco Rubio sums up the Trump administration’s core foreign policy aim in this clip from his February address to the Munich Security Conference.
The most significant diplomatic address in 50 years?
You decide:
Also, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. says his father and uncle would align with Trump on Iran and the economy—while sovereign nations move outside NATO to broker peace, and figures like Peter Navarro and Scott Bessent openly invoke the American System, the post-WWII imperial order is beginning to write its own obituary.
That’s it, see below, we are no longer being controlled by globalists and Davos. America is now sovereign, operating under the American system of political economy.
These crazy people will no longer dictate insane ideologies to the rest of the world.
The propagandists will twist this news, but understand what it truly means. Celebrate!
Globalism is over! 🇺🇸💜
SEEN & HEARD:
RFK on Trump’s use of power, and why he joined MAGA.
Trump tells allies to ‘go get your own oil’
But wait, THERE’s MORE!
President Trump Is Fundamentally Restructuring the International Trade Order
Peter Navarro at Politico's Economy Summit in March 2026:
“President Trump is achieving what nobody imagined was possible: fundamentally restructuring an international trade order that was cheating Americans for decades.”
and,
“Our trade policy is fundamentally revamping the entire world order… Donald Trump is going back in history - channeling Alexander Hamilton, channeling McKinley, channeling Henry Clay - adopting an America First policy where the protection against unfair trade makes us stronger.”
From Hamilton to Today: Trade and U.S. Economic Strategy with Ambassador Jamieson Greer (1:20-2:20)
Greer invoking Hamilton directly at Davos
Secretary of State Marco Rubio stated:
“We in America have no interest in being polite and orderly caretakers of the West’s managed decline.”
Indicating the rejection of the CFR’s Project 1980s and what’s also known as Degrowth.
Propaganda at the highest level—circulating through major outlets like Financial Times:
“Scott Bessent has discussed tightening the U.S. Treasury’s oversight of the Federal Reserve by adopting elements of the Bank of England’s…”
🔗 https://www.ft.com/content/9d1859f0-2f93-4ff1-8cfb-8046342bf9f7?syn-25a6b1a6=1
Demand for Retraction (via The Guardian):
🔗 https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/mar/28/treasury-department-financial-times-federal-reserve
Scott Bessent destroys the Financial Times & Bank of England
Official Response from Scott Bessent (via X):
🔗
Statement from Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent:
“By publishing this explicitly false story, the FT has officially become tabloid trash for market participants. Despite my direct, on-the-record denial of ever having advocated, explored, or espoused the idea that the Chancellor–Bank of England statute should serve as a prototype for a Treasury–Federal Reserve relationship, FT journalists manufactured a story with the headline, ‘Scott Bessent praised Bank of England as model for tighter oversight of the Federal Reserve.’
These journalists have clearly fabricated a story to give the impression that both I and the Trump Administration are setting about restructuring the relationship… at a time when President Donald Trump has launched what they describe as an ‘unprecedented assault’ on the world’s most important central bank.
Their assertion is based on vague statements from unnamed ‘financial industry executives familiar with the matter.’ In short, FT has manufactured an entirely false policy position for me and the Administration.
Other than furthering a malicious narrative of dysfunction and division, it is difficult to understand why they would further damage their already diminished credibility.
Over the past 10 years, I have written more than 20,000 words on Federal Reserve decisions, personnel, structure, and reform. Nowhere have I ever mentioned this notion.
There is much to be said about the Bank of England, but any attempt to replicate its operating framework in the United States has never been contemplated.
This reflects the worst tradition of Fleet Street—manufacturing news rather than reporting it.”
For Bessent’s full policy position on Federal Reserve reform:
🔗 https://www.international-economy.com/TIE_Sp25_Bessent.pdf
This moment is not about a single misreported article, it exposes a much deeper fault line between two competing systems. On one side is the centralized model of global finance, where institutions like central banks operate within a managed, international framework shaped by legacy power centers such as the City of London. On the other is the American System of political economy rooted in sovereignty, national development, and accountability to the people rather than transnational financial interests.
What’s being attempted here is narrative framing: to suggest that the United States is moving toward the very model it is, in reality, rejecting. By falsely linking Treasury policy to the Bank of England framework, the implication is that America remains aligned with the same global financial architecture it historically fought to break free from, and is in fact, breaking free from right now in real time.
But if you understand the distinction, you can see through it. This isn’t reform within the system, it’s a challenge to the system itself. And that is precisely why the narrative response is so aggressive.
Brace for impact—the globalist media spin and propaganda machine is going into overdrive.
Soli Deo Gloria!
Summer & Brad
*More on our new American system of political economy listed below. + more in our archive.
Healing The MAGA Divide: Why is MAGA Mad at Trump?
The MAGA base is divided over Trump’s war on Iran. Will they abandon the America First agenda at the polls in November?
American System of political economy · globalism collapse · Great Reset failure · Davos agenda · sovereignty vs globalism · post-WWII world order · NATO bypass diplomacy · energy geopolitics · Trump economic policy · RFK Jr Trump alignment · Peter Navarro trade policy · Scott Bessent Federal Reserve · central banking critique · Bank of England model rejection · City of London influence · global financial system · sovereign nation resurgence · international trade restructuring · economic nationalism · monetary policy reform · propaganda media narratives · Financial Times controversy · narrative warfare · perception management · globalist media spin · information warfare · engineered consensus · elite power structures · technocratic governance · anti-globalism movement · American sovereignty restored · Hamiltonian economics · national development strategy · geopolitical realignment · energy independence USA · Hormuz Strait strategy · NATO decline narrative · global power shift · Armor of Truth analysis