How the Third Assassination Attempt Proves Trump Is Dismantling Globalism
The Case For Optimism: Correcting those who claim the Trump Administration is orchestrating globalism and completing the project for Technocratic Regionalism.
The third (some say fourth or fifth) assassination attempt on President Trump is a stark reminder of exactly what is at stake. While the would-be assassins’ manifestos project a radical Leftist contempt for Trump, the ultimate inspiration of their contempt comes from a source operating beyond the headlines and beyond the analysis of many researchers.
What you will learn form this piece, and from the valuable archive Summer has created in this Substack collection, is that America has been under the external influence of one specific system of foreign influence for over 250 years. The radicalism of the loud left in America today, echoed by Cole Thomas Allen in his assassination manifesto, is but one in a constellation of symptoms, a conveniently cultivated contempt, that has been enabled and goaded from America’s oldest strategic enemy.
To understand this claim, we need to first identify the right enemy. Who controls the Left, most of the Right, Israel, Iran, and who used to control Venezuela. Who are the globalists? How could they ever be defeated if we do not know how to identify them? What are we defending? What is really under attack? What is truly at stake if we lose? These questions have to be answered before we can understand why ‘they’ want Donald Trump dead and out of the way for good.
Why is the second Trump administration the first chance we have had in many, many years to restore the American Republic?
Get comfortable. This will take awhile.
Let’s begin.
Who Are We?
Embedded within every political system are the seeds of its own destruction. In America, the blessings of Liberty and the seeds of our destruction are found in one and the same place — in the interpretation of morality and virtue. Our Founders were very much aware of this fundamental principle and expressed it boldly. The Declaration of Independence was a shout across the Atlantic Ocean to the ears of the Tyrant and his enabling oligarchs — a declaration of anti-imperialism.
Thousands of letters and debates yielded the establishment of a new nation and system of government. The best of the Enlightenment principles of Natural Law and Natural Rights would be grounded in and restrained by the Moral Law of God. And the chief purpose of that government would be to secure the American people’s right to self-determination and the pursuit of virtue. The Founders understood that none of these principles would survive apart from a coherent, transcendent, and unchanging standard anchoring the meaning of morality and virtue.
America first means God first. The American system, or America as founded, means The People first. The Trump Administration’s National Security Strategy (NSS), released in December 2025, represents a return to these founding principles and a distinct disentanglement from the same Imperial-style, meddling, interventionist, system of globalism from which the American Founders intended to separate.
The wealth, independence and security of a country, are materially connected with the prosperity of manufactures.
— Alexander Hamilton
For anyone who takes the time to read its 34 brief but straightforward pages, it will become evident that the NSS is a reassertion of those founding principles. At the heart of the strategy lie three principles: prosperity, prestige, and peace.1
These are the principles that are and have been under attack since our Founders first burned the ears of the tyrannical British monarch some 250 years ago. Our intrepid warrior ancestors led by General Washington fought and won a bloody war for these principles.
The Treaty of Paris was signed on September 3, 1783. The victory of the hot war with the British was ours. But what came next were the ongoing campaigns of subversion to weaken our Republic.
Who Are They?
The Empire never wanted the American colonies to become a sovereign nation. British colonialism was a project for the expansion of British wealth and power. A Sovereign and independent America would be a direct threat to their project. The continent’s vast territory and abundant natural resources were a prize they were accustomed to taking. But the fruit of the land itself combined with the settlers’ heritage of religious and philosophical understanding, and the political and economic savvy ingrained America’s revolutionaries presented a truly formidable opposition to British dominance.
What Americans know today as “globalism” and “the globalists” originates from the anti-American presuppositions of British Imperialism and the anti-human philosophical tradition of British Empiricism—the philosophical foundation of Social Darwinism, Fabianism, population control, and the notion of man as a beast with urges to be managed, and social contract theory, only an aristocratic elite were sufficiently evolved to be the managers.
Throughout the 18th, 19th, and into the 20th century, Britain’s presumed divine right to rule and colonize transformed into a Satanic urge to dominate, control, and exact every square inch of planet earth and all of humanity.
The origin of many of the modern world’s most aloof ideals and oppressive ideologies sprang directly from Britain — Social Darwinism, population control, Fabian socialism, global banking cartels, postmodernism, and the early environmental movements that became Agenda 21, 2030, and the Sustainable Development Goals, to name a few.
“The City of London Corporation”
America’s Longest and Most Significant Strategic Enemy
The origins of globalism have only recently become even partially apparent to the public at-large. Americans still can’t quite identify the particular source of that which poses the most direct threat to their individual Liberty and national sovereignty. This delay in our collective awareness is understandable, given the subversion of a true telling of American history in our schools and media. But it is inexcusable given the clarity of the warnings passed to us from those who first separated America from the tyranny of globalism/imperialism.
The Founders, almost in unison, warned us of the fragility of our Liberty, and from where, or from whom, the next threat to our covenantal inheritance would come.
America won the war for independence, but the preservation of that independence, in governance and economic sovereignty,
would require continual struggle.
— A faithful aggregation of statements made by
Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, Alexander Hamilton, and James Madison.
If our national and political sovereignty were secured with bullets, America’s economic, industrial, banking, and even ideological sovereignty has remained under consistent threat to this day.
America’s most consistent strategic enemy in our ongoing war for independence has been a global banking and financial nexus that continued its expansion after the outward expression of the empire seemed to fade. It’s important to clarify, this expansion was not necessarily in the interest of the British people or even the monarchy. But in the interest of an oligarchical system of power and influence directed and maintained from the City of London Corporation. To grasp the kind of power and influence I am suggesting here, it is important to understand what “The City of London” actually is — very, very old money and power reaching back two millennia.
Documentaries available in the footnotes:
The Spider’s Web: Britains Second Empire | The City of London2
Secret City investigates the City of London 3
Britain’s Most Powerful Secret Organization: Chatham House4
(But read books! We must read for understanding.)
The City of London Corporation is a one square-mile sovereign district within greater London possessing a kind of historical provenance and gravitas that outranks even parliament and the monarchy — traditionally, the British monarch must ask permission to enter the district.
The City of London stands as one of the oldest continuous institutions in the Western world. Long before British Parliament and long before the constitutional monarchy took shape, the City of London was already established as a center of power, commerce, and governance.
“The City” was the financial heart of the British Empire, mobilizing the capital and credit that enabled imperial expansion. Lloyd’s of London, an institution of The City of London, played a critical role insuring ships, cargo, and voyages—making global trade at scale economically viable.
That legacy continues today, as Lloyd’s remains a central node in the global marine insurance market, underwriting complex risks for international shipping, including cargo vessels and oil tankers that move the bulk of the world’s trade. The City of London sits at the epicenter of modern supply chains, controlling global energy flows and transportation of goods.
To this day, “The City” has a representative called the Remembrancer who attends official sessions and sits alongside the Speaker monitoring legislation, advising on its impact, and protecting the interests of “The City.”
The City of London has been the central node of a global financial system that has enjoyed dominance for more than 75 years. The significance of “The City’s” role in effecting or manipulating global markets, currencies, information, conflicts, and therefore the global economy must be understood to realize the source of much of the destabilization in the Middle East.
The fact of the matter is, the British Empire did not actually end. It transformed. “The City” was always the engine of the empire, and “The City” lived on keeping the profitable parts of empire and tossing overboard the expensive parts. Colonies and territories were released. What they kept was the most profitable tactic perfected under the practice of British colonialism.
Conflict.
Breaking The Pattern of Destabilization
The most powerful figures of the empire shifted their influence from the forefront into the shadows of “The City” where real wealth and control was always assumed and quietly managed. The new Great Game shifted from capturing flags and territories into the dark arts of alchemical-like finance and market speculation, specifically, to create, sustain, and profit from permanent conflict in strategic locations around the world—globalism as we know it today.
This is the underlying meaning of Trump’s operation in Venezuela, and the purpose of an otherwise inexplicable strike on Iran. Trump’s Iran strategy is only confusing to those who neglect to acknowledge the imperial chessboard arranged for the Great Game in the 20th century by the same City elites.
Iran has been a disruptive knight occupying the Middle East. Venezuela was a strategic pawn, an international hub for global narco-trafficking and dark money illicit capital flows, and a pressure point from which America’s open enemies could reach directly into the United States.
These two pieces, Venezuela and Iran, because of their location and resources, were able to be used to exert disproportionate influence over energy flows, regional stability, unregulated global shadow banking (how billions in drug money is moved), and strategic alignment that have extended and empowered the globalist system for decades.
A globalist system centered in the City of London with affiliates throughout Europe, Asia, and even within the United States. Embedded for decades, hidden beneath financial and market jargon, and obfuscated by political narratives, this global banking cartel, its collusion with radical Islam and South American-style communism, is the coronary artery of what everyone calls “globalism” today.
The Argument:
If globalism is the primary strategic enemy of American prosperity and prestige, and has been the major influence preventing a real peace in the Middle East, and if all of this works to the detriment of American political, economic, and industrial independence, then this is the system that must be dismantled if America is to become great again. “Again” implying a tradition to which we must return. Not a new technocratic regionalism or continuation of globalist expansion and intrigue. But, a real effort for a true return to American sovereignty.
For any president or administration genuinely intending to break the grip of globalism’s dark consensus that has been actively weakening the United States for decades so that such a return to greatness is even possible, it follows logically and strategically, that these two major pieces that have played such a major role in maintaining the status quo must be dealt with first. Otherwise, the system that has broken America down to the current state of confusion will only continue and America will surely fall or be rendered into compliance in some other form — that would be America in name only.
This is the diagnosis and prescription found in the Trump administration’s National Security Strategy. If you read the document and can determine any other conclusion I would be eager to hear to hear it. Because it seems crystal clear to me that the Trump administration has identified the right enemy and is doing something that no president or administration has even tried to do in 50 years. To, actually and with permanency, Make America Great Again.
The Data Behind The Argument
The American System — What The Trump Admin is Returning To
Alexander Hamilton’s American System emphasized national manufacturing, productive labor, protective trade policy, and sovereign economic development as the foundation of genuine independence.
From our perspective at Armor of Truth, the renewed emphasis on domestic production represents a rejection of the post-industrial model that prioritized global supply chains and financialization over tangible national strength. In this context, the recent surge in manufacturing is not simply an economic data point; it signals an effort to restore a framework designed to preserve both industrial capacity and national sovereignty.
This is the context in which supporters argue today’s economic data should be interpreted.
More than a debate about tariffs or quarterly output, the real question is civilizational: whether nations retain the ability to produce, govern, and sustain themselves, or whether they become administratively managed regions within a global system detached from local accountability.
The revival of industry, therefore, is not merely an economic correction but a reassertion of sovereignty, a return to a model in which productive labor, national independence, and ordered liberty reinforce one another.
“The price of liberty is eternal vigilance.”
— Thomas Jefferson
“Liberty, once lost, is lost forever.”
— John Adams
What Are The British Saying About Trump
This from the most recent House of Lords Foreign relations Report5
Published on April 26, 2026
HOUSE OF LORDS International Relations and Defence Committee
3rd Report of Session 2024–26
Adjusting to new realities: rebalancing the UK- US partnership
“Since the Second World War, the UK has viewed the United States as its closest and most valuable ally… the relationship is under greater strain today than at any point since the Second World War. The second Trump administration has shaken long-held certainties…the introduction of tariffs, the withdrawal from key multilateral frameworks, the absence of consultation ahead of recent US strikes in Iran, and an unpredictable and, at times, antagonistic diplomatic style, are forcing UK policymakers to confront uncomfortable questions about the future of the relationship.”
“…a related pivot towards burden sharing on European security, growing resentment of globalisation, a recourse to economic nationalism, and a polarised domestic climate, are trends that will shape US foreign policy for the next decade. The UK must reframe its relationship with the US and adopt a more balanced approach to hedge against a less dependable ally whose strategic priorities are shifting.”
“[This] does mean banishing the sentimental illusion that the relationship is somehow “special” or destined to endure in perpetuity.”
“On foreign policy, the gulf between the UK and US on the relevance of the rules-based international order has widened under this Trump administration…US policy is increasingly influenced by a public yearning to prioritise national interests ahead of global ones…The UK cannot assume that the US will retain its position as steward of the global order.”
What Researchers and Podcasters Are Saying About Trump
Many today, even some of those in our corner of the public square, would have you believe that either Trump is controlled by Israel or the globalists. Others, such as the once sage and highly respected Christian researcher and author, Patrick Wood, are telling their readers and podcast listeners that President Trump is merely orchestrating an expansion of globalist control or completing the control grid of technocratic regionalism — another form of globalism that represents the same ends as the Satanic New World Order.
Still others who claim to oppose globalism, Whitney Webb and Iain Davis of Unlimited Hangout, Derek Broze of The Conscious Resistance, and researcher/author Courtnay Turner — who recently published a book on this topic with Patrick Wood — would like you to believe that Christianity and the public arguments of the Christian worldview are anachronistic, unwelcome, and invalid in debates about the governing direction of America. 6
Every nation and government is by nature a theocracy.
The only question is which god is being served?7
Assassin’s Creed: Cole Thomas Allen
The Third Attempt on Trump’s Life in Under Two Years
It’s beginning to look like Allen, the shooter at the White House Correspondents Dinner on Saturday night, had some help. Whether Allen was a lone wolf or not, we can safely say that the polarizing rhetorical influence of the Left and the Mockingbird, globalist-controlled, mainstream media, as well as social media, have radicalized a significant portion of our nation.
But for what purpose?
Who wants Trump gone?
Is it the Left? Sure. Who controls the Left?
The globalists? The elites? The Satanic cabal? Yes, yes, and yes.
But who are they?
In other words, who is ultimately responsible for the long-term project of demoralizing and destabilizing America?
The Persistent Project Undermining American Liberty
Twenty years ago, we heard both Republicans and Democrats warning against the weaponization of multiculturalism, diversity, and resentment as an effective operation to bring down America, and that they saw it growing.
One of the first documents to “go viral” on the internet was a short speech by Democrat Governor of Colorado, Richard Lamm, in 2001. Lamm warned of a force deliberately fostering disunity in America in exactly the same terms we today describe as “woke.”
To Our Critics Who Claim Trump Is Helping Globalism
If we can agree that the status quo in the West since WW2 has been the rise of the Liberal International Order, which, among other things, has included the managed decline of the middle class through deindustrialization, manipulation of currencies, financialization of everything, and centralizing control of governments, banking, and trade.
If we can agree that those who have maintained that status quo would do everything in their power to protect their investment. And if we agree that America’s institutions have been slowly infiltrated and transformed by that same force that both Democrats and Republicans were criticizing 20–30 years ago, then we can surely agree that they would be motivated to neutralize anyone, particularly an American president, who posed a legitimate threat to their project.
Is Trump Completing The Global Technocratic Order?
Why Patrick Wood’s and many others’ claims that Trump is a threat to the US Constitution are invalid and Destructive.
We are seeing quite a lot of analysis from podcasters, researchers, and authors on our side of the worldview or Liberty divide claiming that the Trump administration is working against the interests of the American people by helping the globalist project or orchestrating the completion of technocratic regionalism, that Trump’s policy on Iran is merely the same neocon-style foreign policy of interventionism we got from Bush and Obama in Iraq and Afghanistan.
The Trump administration’s National Security Strategy (December 2025) explicitly rejects that model and stands out as utterly unique among the foreign policy strategies of every administration since at least 1988. Why? It prioritizes the sovereignty and strength, and the prosperity of the American people, emphasizing political, industrial, economic, and ideological sovereignty.
Where George H.W. Bush announced and exalted the virtues of the New World Order as the Rules-Based International Order — managed decline, deindustrialization, centralization, etc. — The Trump admin’s NSS stands in bold opposition to all of that.
The Intellectual Tradition Behind The Trump Administration
Michael Anton is a political theorist and scholar who was a primary architect of the National Security Strategy. He was influenced by scholars such as Thomas G. West and Charles Kesler (et al.), who represent the continuation of an intellectual tradition rooted in the Founders’ original American System.
That is the right conceptual frame for distinguishing the present administration from the bipartisan globalist-managerial consensus that preceded it.
But, I am hearing those on our side erroneously and sloppily lumping many of Trump’s advisors in with the Dark Enlightenment, which is the philosophy of SOME Silicon Valley so-called “Tech Bros” who believe the US Constitution is anachronistic and limiting to their notion of progress and seek the creation of technocratic “city states” to replace Constitutional government.
It is incorrect at the very least to describe Anton and other Trump advisors like him from the Claremont Institute and Hillsdale College as wanting to burn down the Constitution and establish something else.
Thinkers like Charles Kesler, Thomas G. West, and Michael Anton — men deeply rooted in the intellectual tradition of the Founding — have spent their lives diagnosing the real crisis in America.
Charles Kesler: The Crisis of The Two Constitutions:
The Founders’ Constitution—rooted in self-government, natural law, and moral order, and
the Progressive Constitution—rooted in administrative control, expert rule, and centralized power
Kesler makes a crucial point. Our problem is not that the American system has failed beyond repair, but that it has been overlaid, distorted, and forgotten.
And yet—Kesler says something many today refuse to say.
Kesler says that he is optimistic.
Why? Because the constitutional structure still has integrity, and because the American people are not as far gone as many think.
Michael Anton: The Return To Sovereignty
Anton takes Kesler’s argument even further, identifying the trajectory we were on, a slow, steady consolidation of power into what he calls, administrative state control—as far as the eye could see.
That was the direction. That was the system. That was the real threat.
Anton said that Conservatism became about policy, means became ends. In other words, Free trade became dogma, intervention became untouchable, and assumptions about immigration became fixed.
And then came Trump.
What does Anton say about the emergence of Trump?
He says that Trump is certainly not a continuation of that system, but a direct interruption of it. Anton points to three areas where the old order was breaking down: Immigration, “Free” or Open Trade, and foreign policy.
Now think about that.
Those are not side issues. Those are the pillars of the globalist framework.
Example: Foreign Policy.
Anton, just as Marco Rubio in Munich last February, says plainly:
“Globalism was a mistake we made together.“
Anton says that he watched Iraq and Afghanistan fail to produce what was promised. Then he accepted responsibility for evaluating and recalibrating his own understanding.
That is not a defense of empire.
That is a repudiation of it.
So when people say today, “This is just the same imperial system.”
We simply ask, Where is the evidence? Have they read and genuinely addressed the National Security Strategy and reevaluated their analysis in light of its prescriptions for America?
Because the intellectual foundation for the globalist status quo of the last 50 to 80 years has already been rejected.
Example: Rejection of “Free” Trade
Anton said that he went back—not to talking points—but to first principles, rereading Adam Smith again, and the intellectual fathers of the Imperial free trade system. He realized that “Free Trade,” the fundamental presupposition of the Liberal International Order, has no moral argument or foundation in virtue. Rather, the system of globalism is based purely on pragmatic efficiency. Survival of the fittest — or the wealthiest — nations, and those who control the markets that sustain the system.
Anton then recognized that the answer to restoring the republic was: reindustrialization, economic sovereignty, and protecting the American worker
That is not globalism. That is the diagnosis and rejection of globalization, and the prescription for reversing its sovereignty-dissolving effects.
Anton noted that when he began to speak in opposition to the Liberal International Order, he, and anyone else who questioned it were cast out.
Anton’s response is simple,
“I didn’t leave the tradition—I questioned its misapplication.”
That is exactly what we are doing now.
The Basic Contradiction of Trump’s Policy Critics
If this administration’s intellectual orbit includes men whose life’s work has been opposing Progressivism, opposing the administrative state, defending the Founders’ Constitution, and restoring constitutional self-government, why should we treat it as simply another expression of the same technocratic project?
Trump’s conservative and libertarian critics have so far failed to deal with that question. Sadly, this rich, largely obfuscated tradition of the American System of Political Economy, originating with Alexander Hamilton and promoted by an economic advisor to Abraham Lincoln, Henry C. Carey, is usually ignored. It was this American system of economics, focused on industrialization, tariffs, and economic sovereignty, that was invoked again in the 1860s to defend against the 19th-century version of globalism, the British Imperial system of “Free Trade” that was intended to keep America in subjugation to the British.
Our colleagues’ omission of these facts from their analysis is not minor or inconsequential.
In fact, it is fatal to their analysis.
The truth is, it would be difficult to find anyone more committed to restoring our Constitutional Republic than many of Trump’s current economic advisors.
The Trump Administration’s National Security Strategy (NSS) says,
“our elites (recent past administrations) pursued “permanent American domination of the entire world,” accepted “forever global burdens,” placed “destructive bets on globalism and so-called ‘free trade’” that hollowed out the middle class and industrial base, and tied American policy to international institutions animated by transnationalism that seeks “to dissolve individual state sovereignty.” NSS 2025
And then the NSS presents Trump’s election and policy strategy as a
“necessary, welcome correction.”
The entire document is a treatise on American sovereignty. But that single passage alone is devastating to the claim that this administration is merely completing the control grid of a global technocratic order.
And let us not forget that President Trump has removed the United States from 66 international organizations and treaties, including the World Health Organization, the United Nations Population Fund, and the objectively evil UNESCO.
This is not the language of global technocracy.
It is the language of national restoration.
How to Directly Refute The Claim that Trump is Completing the “Global Technocracy”
The best answer is not rhetorical heat, but conceptual precision.
Is the Trump administration motivated by Technocratic Globalism or an America First return to political, economic, industrial, and even ideological sovereignty?
A genuinely global technocratic administration would be expected to do several things:
Elevate transnational institutions over national sovereignty,
Normalize rule by experts and administrators over self-government,
Continue deindustrialization in the name of global efficiency,
Universalize the national interest so that every foreign problem becomes America’s burden,
Treat energy, borders, and industrial policy as secondary to global governance goals.
But the Trump administration’s strategy and related actions say the opposite:
Sovereignty is explicit,
Reindustrialization is explicit,
Middle-class restoration is explicit,
Burden-shifting is explicit,
“Forever wars” are rejected,
Sovereignty-dissolving transnationalism is condemned,
Reciprocal trade and domestic production are prioritized,
Administrative overreach is being checked in the courts.
None of that means every policy choice is above criticism.
It does mean that the broad charge of “this is just global technocracy being completed” is too blunt, too stale, and too inattentive to the evidence.
To be clear, our case is NOT cheerleading or blind support. We are reading and reporting from sober, qualified, and cautious sources.
And because there are real indicators of institutional correction in America right now in the Trump administration, we are genuinely hopeful.
Therefore, the burden of proof lies with our peers, researchers such as Patrick Wood, Courtenay Turner, Whitney Webb, Iain Davis, and many others who take a pessimistic, conspiratorial view to support their position against Trump.
Our analysis is grounded in the published primary sources. Therefore, those who claim Trump is a globalist or technocratic tool must explain why the Trump administration’s National Security Strategy should be ignored.
That’s the pessimistic view.
What is the Christian called to believe?
The Optimistic View: Micah 7:8-9
Hope and Faithful Stewardship in Times of Darkness
There is a growing voice—even among conservatives—
insisting that nothing has changed.
They tell us,
This administration is just more of the same. The same globalist machine.
The same technocratic system—just wearing a different mask.
And because of that, they conclude:
There is no reason for optimism. Only suspicion.
Only pessimism and waiting for the next betrayal.
I certainly do understand where that instinct comes from.
For decades, we have been lied to, and since 2020, many of us have been traumatized by the totalitarian urges of our leaders from the federal level to the local. So, their critique was, for many years, not only justified — it was necessary.
But here is the problem.
That framework is now insufficient.
And, as researchers who are responsible for reporting the truth to our readers and listeners, if we refuse to update our understanding in light of new evidence, we are not being discerning—we are being careless.
But let’s go deeper.
In the Book of Micah, we read of God’s Call to Optimism.
“Rejoice not over me, O my enemy; when I fall, I shall rise;
when I sit in darkness, the LORD will be a light to me.”
— Micah 7:8
This is not just about politics. This is about how Christians should think in times of crisis. And this is where Micah 7:8 becomes so important.
The passage is not naïve optimism or blind denial of reality. Micah is speaking in the middle of a time of national corruption, failed leadership, moral collapse, and judgment. Israel had sinned. Judgment was real. The darkness was real. And yet Micah says, “When I fall, I shall rise.” Not because Israel was strong. But because God is faithful.
Verse 9 makes it even clearer:
“I will bear the indignation of the LORD…
because I have sinned…”
— Micah 7:9
This is not pride. This is repentance.
But it is also confidence: “…He will bring me out to the light.”
This is the biblical pattern:
Sin — Discipline — Restoration — Fall — Darkness — Light
(Rinse and repeat.)
The crucial connection and application
for our day that we must not miss:
Optimism, in the biblical sense, is not wishful thinking. It is faithful stewardship in the midst of judgment. Because judgment is always followed by restoration. And God loves HIs people, but He also cares about nations.
God’s people are never called to despair or pessimism. We are called to see clearly, repent honestly, act faithfully, and trust confidently — to seek the truth, think the best of others, and to honor God with glad hearts, trusting in His sovereign design and providential action for His people.
So what does that mean for us right now?
It means, we can acknowledge our nation’s (and personal) past failures, real corruption, the dangers of centralized power, and still say: God is not finished, and the system is not beyond recovery.
And this moment may very well represent a time of revival for the church.
And national correction for America — God willing!
To be crystal clear.
This does not mean that every policy is right, every decision wise, or every outcome guaranteed. But it does mean that we have evidential reasons for optimism. Because what we are seeing is a rejection of endless wars (Iran must be removed from the global chessboard to complete that campaign promise), a reassertion of national sovereignty, a challenge to the administrative state, and a renewed focus on the American people
These are not small things.
These are structural shifts.
And if we cannot recognize the difference between corruption and correction, decline and restoration, judgment and renewal, then we are not being cautious. We are being willfully blind.
A Final Point
This moment is not merely something we observe. It is something that we must steward — faithfully.
Micah does not say, “Sit back and wait.” He says, “I will look to the LORD.”
The prophet acts in faith. And so must we. Because if this is a moment of reordering, realignment, and restoration, then we have a responsibility to engage it, understand it, and shape it. Not for political gain. But for the glory of God.
Ultimately, Liberty is not just a political inheritance. Liberty is a good gift of God, and therefore, Liberty, for Christian Americans, is a stewardship.
And if God, in His providence, has given us a moment, a real opportunity to correct error, restore order, and reassert truth, then to respond with despair and black-pilled pessimism is not humility. It is unfaithfulness.
We have good reasons to be optimistic.
In fact, that is our calling as Christ’s followers in the world.
When the times seem darkest, the Lord is still our light. And right now, under this administration’s leadership, this may be our moment to rise and glorify God in faith.
And, God willing, we will save America and defend our God-given inheritance of Liberty.
RELATED / SEEN & HEARD:
“It Is the British Who Murder Our Presidents”
On Britain’s history of safe-housing anarchist movements
https://www.prometheanaction.com/toolkit/#know-your-enemy
House of Lords Report — “Adjusting to New Realities: Rebalancing the UK/US Partnership”
https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld5901/ldselect/ldintrel/290/290.pdf
Reuters — King Charles on U.S. Mission to Bolster UK’s “Special Relationship” with “Royalist Trump”
https://www.reuters.com/world/uk/king-charles-us-mission-bolster-uks-special-relationship-with-royalist-trump-2026-04-23/
Policy Establishment Perspective - Chatham House Panel Discussion
Lord Darroch on UK dependence on the “rules-based order” (15:00–15:41)
Critique of Trump’s “older, more nationalist” tradition (16:26–16:47)
The National Security Strategies three core principles:
Prosperity To reindustrialize America after decades of deindustrialization. To protect the American worker, the middle class, to ensuring market access and to protect our manufacturing, industry, and intellectual property through tariffs that deter global economic and financial speculation that have weakened America for 50+ years. To return the wealth of the nation to the People who create it.
Prestige To project American stability, power, and goodness/greatness to the world. To avoid signaling weakness. To settle and avoid future internal conflict. To reverse contempt for America on the global stage, to be respected by our allies, and feared by our enemies.
Peace First, to secure the nation and safety of American citizens. To act swiftly and decisively to stabilize the Western hemisphere and dismantle external threats anywhere, both economic and military, to American sovereignty. To judge foreign commitments according to the best interests of the American people and to reject foreign ideological ambitions that intend to dilute American identity.
The Spider’s Web: Britains Second Empire | The City of London
Secret City investigates the City of London, the Corporation that runs it, and its role in the economic crisis.
The film exposes the Corporation’s anti-democratic constitution, the ancient laws which allow it function as a state within a state, and the power wielded by the Corporation over British economic policy, through which it sustains London s prime position at the hub of global finance capital, not least through control of the majority of the world’s tax havens.
But this film is not just for Londoners – the role of the City concerns everyone everywhere.
Britain’s Most Powerful Secret Organization; Chatham House
HOUSE OF LORDS International Relations and Defence Committee 3rd Report of Session 2024–26 Adjusting to new realities: rebalancing the UK- US https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld5901/ldselect/ldintrel/290/290.pdf
America was made great within a distinctly Christian heritage. And a Christian consensus is the only circumstance in which Liberty is possible and a revival of genuine Christianity and Christian engagement with government and influence on policy is the only way the American republic, in its just and virtuous founding, will be restored.
In the Founders’ writings, they refer to Scripture by direct quote or general reference more than all the great philosophers, economic, and political theorists combined.
A recent study revealed that among the writings of the American Founders, in their discussions and debates over the principles of the system of government they ought to establish, 30% of all external references they made were to Scripture, the Word of God as revealed in the Old and New Testaments. More than all the references they made to the great philosophers and Enlightenment political thinkers like John Locke, Montesquieu, Aristotle, et al. combined.
Any argument that separates American government from Christianity, or seeks to exclude Christian rhetoric from policy debates in the public square, diverges fundamentally from the founders’ Constitutional presuppositions and their foundation of Liberty upon the moral law of God. Any claim that it is a violation of the First Amendment for an elected official to speak and govern from his Christian worldview is at least fallacious, incoherent, and invalid, but more frequently in our day, it is a deliberate undermining of the Constitution and the founders vision of how the blessings of Liberty are secured.
Which God does a government serve?
The one true God of Creation and Giver of the Moral Law and Natural Rights?
The god of autonomy (Babel)?
The goddess of Reason (Enlightenment)?
The god of atheism (Secularism)?
The god of Empire, (Imperialist nation building?
Which merged with the religion of Progress, or Progressivism, characterized by the globalist doctrine of spreading “democracy.”
That married the god of Postmodernism, the rejection of absolute truth, fronting the notion of the Constitution as a “living document” to be adapted and updated as morality evolves.
Which was possessed by the demon god of Marxism, characterized by Hegelian power dynamics and Marx’s doctrine of redemption through a permanent state of revolution fueled by envy, resentment, anger, and victimhood.
Which harmonized almost concurrently with the dialectical materialism of neo Marxism and Fabian gradualism, where the priest class masks their eschatology behind the facade of almost imperceptible evolutionary policy change.
These are the false gods that inhabit the vacuum when government rejects Christianity as its foundation for morality and virtue. These are the false gods have been working for over a hundred years to demoralize and destabilize America and to normalize the urge for total government in the hearts of the people.