Navigating the Age of Narratives
Exposing the engineered strategy to dismantle God’s divine order.
The Gospel is the only narrative that saves.
We live in this age of narratives and what we decide to put forth as the dominant story is what we’re going to take for granted as true even if it’s not… the power to set the narrative is the power to define the reality that people live in. -James Lindsay
Since Corona, the battle has moved beyond left vs. right—it’s now nationalists vs. globalists, sovereignty vs. submission, freedom vs. control. This article exposes the formula being used to dismantle God’s divine order and reshape reality to serve a globalist agenda.
The weaponization of extreme ideologies—and their core principles—consistently dismantles the status quo. This is exactly what is being done to us in the West. History has proven this time and again since Rousseau’s emergence.
Jean-Jacques Rousseau was an 18th-century philosopher whose ideas on the "general will" and radical egalitarianism laid the foundation for modern collectivist ideologies, ultimately rejecting the biblical view of individual responsibility under God. By elevating the will of the collective above divine law, Rousseau became the central voice in shaping the ideological framework that fueled the French Revolution, Marxism, and later the Woke movement—all of which seek to dismantle Christianity’s moral and social order.
Rousseau’s ideal of the "general will" laid the groundwork for Marx’s vision of a classless society, where individual rights are sacrificed for collective equality—an idea later repackaged into the Woke movement’s struggle against perceived oppression. The elites bankrolled this ideology, not to liberate, but to weaponize division, destabilize nations, and justify centralized control, ensuring that chaos leads to their engineered order.
Rousseau’s concept of the "general will" replaces divine authority with the will of the collective, making the state or society the ultimate moral arbiter—a direct affront to Jesus Christ and God's sovereign order. It rejects the biblical truth that righteousness comes from God alone, instead elevating human consensus as the highest authority, which ultimately paves the way for tyranny.
In the left-right paradigm, whether wielded by the radical left as a call for equity or by the authoritarian right as a demand for national unity, it replaces absolute truth with shifting human desires.
If we recognize this dialectical game, we can avoid being manipulated into false dichotomies that only serve the ultimate dissolution of truth, order, and sovereignty.
Instead, grounding ourselves in biblical truth and historical wisdom allows us to reject the artificial struggle and expose the real enemy—the globalist forces orchestrating the chaos.
As we have said so many times before, take heed— the so-called "Truth Movement" and the idea of being “awake” is itself a Marxist dialectical tool, not to reveal truth, but to deconstruct reality, dismantle certainty, and pave the way for the Great Reset’s synthetic “solution.”
While left-leaning progressives were being duped by critical theory in classes like women’s studies, many of us with more moderate leanings were drawn into the Truth Movement, seduced by the allure of hidden knowledge—believing we had uncovered secrets most others couldn’t see. After all, the fall of man was a result of man’s desire to know forbidden knowledge.
The Serpent’s Lie: How Deconstructionists Dismantle Truth and Reality
According to Stephen Hicks, deconstruction is a method of analyzing texts to expose and dismantle hidden assumptions, power structures, and contradictions, ultimately undermining objective meaning and truth.
The first and most consequential example of deconstruction—now a defining feature of Progressive elites—dates back to the Garden of Eden, where the serpent posed a seemingly simple yet profoundly subversive question to Eve: “Did God really say…?” This was more than just a challenge to divine authority; it was the first attempt to dismantle absolute truth by introducing doubt, relativism, and the promise of self-determination apart from God.
In that moment, Eve was tempted by the desire for hidden knowledge (gnosis) and the illusion of personal autonomy—the idea that she could determine truth for herself, apart from God’s Word. This same seductive lie has echoed through history, morphing into various philosophical and spiritual movements that seek to unseat divine authority in favor of human self-exaltation.
This foundational deception set the stage for the Theosophical movement and its ideological offspring, which now pervade Western civilization. Theosophy, emerging in the 19th century under Helena Blavatsky, repackaged ancient occult teachings, Eastern mysticism, and esoteric knowledge into a new framework that explicitly rejected biblical Christianity. It revived the serpent’s ancient promise—that mankind could achieve enlightenment, transcendence, and even divinity through self-realization and hidden wisdom. This Gnostic impulse, rooted in rebellion against God’s order, has since infiltrated academia, political philosophy, and cultural discourse, forming the bedrock of Progressive ideology today.
Modern deconstructionists, much like the serpent, do not seek to build but to dismantle, distort, and redefine—whether it be truth, morality, gender, or the very nature of reality itself. They do not offer objective truth, only endless questioning, all while presenting themselves as the enlightened ones who hold the “hidden knowledge” needed to free mankind from the so-called oppression of traditional values. Just as Eve was promised liberation but found only separation from God, today’s postmodernists promise enlightenment, yet they deliver only confusion, nihilism, and societal fragmentation.
Thus, the same spiritual deception that ensnared Eve remains at the heart of the ideological warfare consuming the West. At its core, it is a rebellion against divine order, a rehashing of the original lie: that man can become his own god. The result, then and now, is the same—estrangement from truth, collapse of moral order, and ultimately, destruction.
Centuries-Old Influence on Society
In fact, pertaining to the centuries old hidden hand influence on society we’ve been subject to, Adam Weishaupt, founder of the Illuminati, exploited this innate human tendency. He believed secrecy was the most effective tool for control, leveraging people’s thirst for access to “hidden truths”—whether real or fabricated. This strategy enabled him to construct a hierarchical order where initiates believed they were uncovering deeper wisdom, when in reality, they were being led into a system of control—one that operated outside of God’s divine order and revelation.
To embed anti-God teachings and ways of thinking into culture, Weishaupt and the elite employed casuistry—a tactic still used today—where rational arguments are manipulated to reach dubious, deceptive, or self-serving conclusions, often on moral issues. In other words, propaganda designed to lead us into a counterfeit understanding of life and our creation story.
The thirst for hidden knowledge, whether sought through occult mysticism or repackaged in the "critical consciousness" framework to appear more intellectual and socially acceptable, is what society today calls "awake" and "woke."
The seductive lure of "hidden knowledge"—whether through today’s woke "critical consciousness" or by identification as “Awake”—stems from the same epistemological roots: Marx and Rousseau. Though “Awake” and “Woke” are marketed differently to the Left-Right paradigms, both exploit the same impulse—the desire to see behind the curtain—tailoring their appeal to different personalities and sensibilities. Sadly, both are toxically led to believe they have the moral high ground over the other making each side see the other as an existential threat. Hence, divide and conquer moves the goal post. Ultimately, both ideologies lead to destruction without Christ.
Beware, the "Truth Movement" falls into the trap of Post-Ironic Nihilism, the belief that "everything is fake" and fuels a rejection of all institutions—including conservative ones—leaving no foundation for truth. More on this below.
This is not a battle between left and right but a carefully orchestrated collapse designed to deconstruct reality and dissolve nation-states, erase God from society, and usher in a globalist-controlled post-truth order.
The goal is not to let either side "win" but to weaponize their conflict until a controlled, globalist "solution" is imposed.
Dialectical Materialism
Most of us have heard of dialectical materialism, but have we truly understood its capture of our own minds?
Dialectical Materialism as conceptualized by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, is a framework that views history as a struggle of opposing forces—primarily economic classes—resulting in continual transformation. While traditionally applied to class struggle (bourgeoisie vs. proletariat), the same dialectical process is observable in the forced conflict between far-left and far-right movements.
Dialectical Materialism as a Tool for Deconstructing Reality
In a modern sense, far-left and far-right movements are dialectically positioned against one another to create controlled chaos, polarization, and eventually synthesis (a "new order"). This process mirrors the Hegelian dialectic:
Thesis – The far-left seeks to deconstruct traditional structures (e.g., family, religion, nation-states).
Antithesis – The far-right emerges as a reactionary force, sometimes adopting authoritarian or extreme measures in response.
Synthesis – The resulting conflict destabilizes the status quo, leading to a "managed solution" (often globalist in nature) that further dissolves national sovereignty and moral absolutes.
How This Interplay Serves Globalist Interests
Engineered Conflicts Justify Centralized Power
Extreme leftist activism (identity politics, cultural Marxism, mass immigration, woke ideology)provokes reactionary movements.
The rise of extreme right-wing nationalism, accelerationism, or authoritarian responses justifies increased state control and surveillance.
The globalist ruling class uses these extremes to introduce new forms of governance, favoring more centralized, technocratic control.
Both Extremes Lead to the Same Result: The Destruction of the Middle
The far-left erodes national identity, family structures, and traditional morality.
The far-right (especially when exaggerated or provoked) creates instability that warrants crackdowns and justifies censorship and repression.
True conservatism, Christian morality, and national sovereignty get caught in the crossfire.
The Endgame: A New Global "Synthesis"
The goal is not to let either side "win" but to weaponize their conflict until a controlled, globalist "solution" is imposed.
This new synthesis takes the form of technocratic governance, AI surveillance, and loss of national sovereignty.
The dialectical method creates perpetual crisis cycles, ensuring that nations, economies, and people remain in flux—more dependent on centralized control.
Conclusion: Understanding the Game
If we recognize this dialectical game, we can avoid being manipulated into false dichotomies that only serve the ultimate dissolution of truth, order, and sovereignty.
Instead, grounding ourselves in biblical truth and historical wisdom allows us to reject the artificial struggle and expose the real enemy—the globalist forces orchestrating the chaos.
The Post-Modernist Right: A Reactionary Mirror of the Left?
The Post-Modernist Right is an emerging ideological force that mirrors the Left’s deconstructionist tendencies but applies them in service of right-wing objectives. It represents a departure from traditional conservatism, which has historically been rooted in absolute truth, objective morality, and the preservation of order. Instead, the Post-Modernist Right often embraces subjectivity, irony, chaos, and a rejection of universal truth—similar to the Post-Modern Left, but with a different set of targets.
“The Reaction” is The “Real Action” - Woke Right Trap.
The Post-Modernist Right has adopted postmodern techniques to critique and oppose these globalist trends. This movement often utilizes the same tools that have been employed to erode traditional structures, turning them against the prevailing globalist and secular narratives. However, this approach carries the risk of further destabilizing the foundational principles of nationhood and spirituality, potentially aligning with the very objectives it seeks to counteract.
In essence, while the Post-Modernist Right arises as both an organic and planned reaction to globalist and secular pressures, its adoption of postmodern strategies will inadvertently contribute to the dissolution of the nation-state and the marginalization of religious values, aligning with the broader goals of globalism.
To understand this phenomenon, let's break it down:
1. What is Postmodernism?
Postmodernism, as a philosophical movement, rejects grand narratives, objective truth, and traditional structures in favor of relativism, irony, and deconstruction. It arose in the 20th century as a critique of Enlightenment rationality, science, and absolute moral systems. Postmodernist thought has been heavily used by the Left to deconstruct traditional values, gender norms, historical narratives, and religious structures. Herbert Marcuse’s Liberating Tolerance is a key example.
How Does This Apply to the Right?
The Post-Modernist Right mirrors the deconstructive methods of the Post-Modern Left but applies them to dismantle progressive institutions, narratives, and ideologies. Instead of arguing from traditional, faith-based, or nationalist principles, they use:
Irony & Nihilism → “Nothing is real, so why should we play by the Left’s rules?”
Hyper-revisionist history → Reinterpreting historical events to fit an alternative narrative.
Moral Relativism for Political Ends → Weaponizing the Left’s own moral flexibility against them.
Subversion of Subversion → Mocking and dismantling progressive ideals through satire, memes, and trolling.
2. The Characteristics of the Post-Modernist Right
Unlike traditional conservatism, which seeks to preserve existing cultural norms and moral frameworks, the Post-Modernist Right often seeks to destabilize modern progressive norms—sometimes for the sake of deconstruction itself.
3. The Evolution of the Right in the Digital Age
The Post-Modernist Right emerged largely in reaction to the failures of classical liberalism, neoconservatism, and traditional conservatism, which were perceived as ineffective against the Left’s march through institutions. Instead of appealing to logic, faith, or history, this new right-wing movement fights with the tools of deconstruction, absurdity, and ideological jiu-jitsu.
Key Influences
Meme Culture & Internet Warfare
"Clown World," NPC memes, irony poisoning, accelerationism.
The online Woke Right often rejects reasoned debate in favor of ridiculing their opponents into submission. (aka Hatecraft fuels the cycle of division).
Post-Ironic Nihilism
A sense that "everything is fake" leads to a rejection of traditional institutions—even conservative ones. (Paves the way for the Great Reset)
Strategic Differences From Old-School Conservatives
Neocons/Establishment Right: Defend American liberal democracy, globalization, and interventionism.
Traditional Conservatives: Defend faith, family, and classical morality.
Post-Modern Right: Seeks not to preserve the system, but to burn it down and replace it with something else. (Paves the way for the Great Reset)
4. Dangers of the Post-Modern Right
While this movement has successfully exposed the hypocrisy and weakness of the modern Left, it also comes with serious risks:
1. The Trap of Pure Destruction Without a Vision
The Left thrives on deconstruction, but what happens when the Right adopts the same approach? (Paves the way for the Great Reset)
The danger is that there is no core philosophy to build upon—only reaction and chaos. (Paves the way for the Great Reset)
If the Right fights purely with irony and trolling, does it actually stand for anything meaningful? (Paves the way for the Great Reset)
2. The Danger of Relativism on the Right
The Left’s postmodernism led to moral and cultural decay—will the Right’s version do the same? (Paves the way for the Great Reset)
If “truth doesn’t matter,” what stops the Right from falling into the same abyss as the woke movement? (Paves the way for the Great Reset)
3. Potential for State Crackdowns
The Left controls the institutions (media, education, government, intelligence agencies).
The more extreme elements of the Post-Modernist Right (white identity politics, accelerationist rhetoric, etc.) give the government excuses to justify censorship and persecution. (Paves the way for the Great Reset)
Post-Modernist Right accelerationist rhetoric is a reactionary ideological stance that seeks to intensify societal collapse in order to hasten the downfall of liberal democracy, globalist control, or perceived degeneracy, with the aim of either restoring traditional order or ushering in a new, more radical system. It borrows from postmodernist skepticism, rejecting grand narratives and institutions, while embracing chaos as a catalyst for transformation. This rhetoric often overlaps with Nietzschean nihilism, techno-futurism, and radical traditionalism, creating a paradoxical fusion of hyper-modern critique with ultra-reactionary goals.
4. Weakening of Christian and Moral Foundations
Traditional conservatism is rooted in faith and objective truth.
If the Post-Modernist Right becomes dominant, will it erode what remains of the Christian moral order?
5. Where Does This Lead?
Best-Case Scenario:
The Post-Modern Right forces the Left to collapse under the weight of its own contradictions, leading to a revival of nationalism, traditionalism, and moral order.
The chaos is temporary and results in the re-establishment of a stable, God-centered civilization.
Worst-Case Scenario:
The Right embraces deconstruction and irony too much, loses all sense of absolute truth, and ends up in the same postmodern abyss as the Left.
Nothing gets rebuilt, and the decline continues into either total globalist control or anarchy.
6. Conclusion: The Post-Modernist Right Must Be Careful
The Post-Modernist Right has effectively countered the Left’s dominance through satire, deconstruction, and cultural guerrilla warfare. However, if it lacks a foundational truth and guiding vision, it risks becoming another form of nihilistic decay rather than a true counterforce.
The Key Question:
Will the Post-Modernist Right lead to a rebirth of traditionalism and faith—or will it fall into the same moral relativism that aims to destroy the West in the first place?
For a movement to be truly anti-globalist and anti-Marxist, it must be built on truth—God’s truth, not just mockery and reaction.
WHAT IS WOKE EPISTEMOLOGY?
The technical term for WOKE originates from educator Joe Kincheloe, who coined "critical constructivist epistemology" in the early 2000s. Kincheloe’s framework builds on critical theory and constructivism, arguing that knowledge is socially constructed and shaped by power structures. In this view, dominant forces control what people think and know by shaping their learning, speech, and perception. "Blue Knowledge" refers to ideas outside the accepted framework, considered more valid than the mainstream "false consciousness" designed to maintain control.
Key Concepts of Kincheloe’s Critical Constructivist Epistemology:
Power Determines Knowledge: Institutions and elites control what is considered "truth" by shaping education, media, and discourse.
Transformative Worldview: People should critically deconstruct dominant knowledge systems to reveal hidden biases and oppression.
"Blue Knowledge": Alternative or marginalized perspectives outside the dominant narrative should be elevated as more valid than "false consciousness."
This concept underpins woke ideology by framing reality as a constructed power struggle, where dismantling perceived oppression requires challenging existing knowledge systems. Essentially, it is Marxist epistemology, rebranded through postmodern and critical theory lenses.
Socialism, by its very nature, demands ever-increasing state control to enforce economic "equity," inevitably leading to communism—the final stage where all private property, individual liberty, and dissent are eradicated under total government authority.
Winston Churchill said Socialism is the gospel of envy.
Winston Churchill’s statement that “Socialism is the gospel of envy” is an incisive critique of socialism’s underlying moral and psychological appeal. At its core, socialism does not merely promote economic redistribution—it fosters resentment toward those who have more, framing wealth as inherently unjust and acquired through oppression. Churchill’s phrase captures how socialism weaponizes envy, using it as a driving force for social and political change.
1. Socialism Thrives on Class Resentment
Socialist rhetoric consistently vilifies the wealthy, portraying them as exploiters rather than as individuals who have created value through innovation, hard work, or risk-taking.
Instead of promoting economic mobility, socialism seeks to tear down those at the top rather than lift up those at the bottom.
This aligns with Churchill’s “gospel of envy”—rather than encouraging personal responsibility or ambition, socialism stokes resentment against success.
2. The Moral Fallacy: Covetousness as Justice
Christianity and classical ethics warn against envy as a destructive vice (Exodus 20:17, Proverbs 14:30). Socialism, however, turns envy into a virtue, treating it as the basis for “justice” and “equity.”
True justice upholds fairness without punishing success, but socialist policies often focus on forced redistribution rather than empowerment.
By institutionalizing envy, socialism incentivizes grievance over gratitude and discourages the virtues of diligence, entrepreneurship, and generosity.
3. The Economic Reality: Shared Misery, Not Shared Prosperity
Historically, socialist policies lead not to widespread prosperity but universal impoverishment—as seen in the Soviet Union, Maoist China, Venezuela, and North Korea.
Instead of lifting the poor, socialism crushes economic freedom and innovation, ensuring that everyone is equally miserable rather than allowing individuals to flourish.
Churchill also famously said:
“The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings; the inherent virtue of socialism is the equal sharing of miseries.”
This perfectly illustrates how socialism, driven by envy, results in stagnation rather than progress.
4. The Political Function of Envy: Control and Dependency
Socialist leaders use envy as a political tool to centralize power. By convincing people that their struggles are the fault of the wealthy, they justify government expansion, confiscation, and social engineering.
The ultimate goal is not economic equality but dependency on the state—creating a class of permanently aggrieved citizens who rely on government intervention.
This false promise of justice keeps populations distracted from real oppression (government overreach, economic mismanagement, globalist control).
Conclusion: Socialism and the Sin of Envy
Churchill’s assessment of socialism as “the gospel of envy” is strikingly accurate. It masquerades as compassion while sowing division, turns vice into virtue, and replaces the biblical ethic of gratitude and stewardship with resentment and entitlement. In the end, socialism does not solve poverty—it institutionalizes bitterness, dependency, and mediocrity under the guise of fairness.
Closing Thoughts
In the face of relentless deception designed to capture our minds and hearts away from God’s eternal kingdom, Christless conservatism is doomed to fail. Without God's law as the foundation of truth and reality, society will continue to drift into darkness. Now more than ever, we must stand firm in prayer, remain unwavering in faith, and trust in God’s sovereign plan for the redemption of mankind.
We must restore our constitutional republic and the rule of law, but we must also resist the trap of reckless overreaction—lest we fall into a sinful, self-destructive response that ultimately serves the globalist elite’s Great Reset and Agenda 21. True victory comes not through reactionary chaos, but through steadfast faith, wisdom, and unwavering commitment to God's order.
Walk in a manner worthy of the calling to which you have been called. (Ephesians 4:1-6)
In the end, the pursuit of hidden knowledge, self-sovereignty, and endless deconstruction does not lead to enlightenment—it leads to rebellion against God’s holy and divine order. The deception that began in Eden and has echoed through secret societies, Theosophy, and modern Progressive ideology is not a path to salvation, but a calculated dismantling of absolute truth. To merely “wake up” to the world’s corruption is not redemption; it is yet another iteration of the serpent’s lie, leading souls further into confusion and despair. But no matter how far man strays, no matter how deeply deception takes root, the truth remains unshaken: Jesus Christ is Lord, and in the end, every knee shall bow and every tongue confess His name.
Summer Black, Director, Armor of Truth
Faith is Resistance!
About Armor of Truth: https://armoroftruth.substack.com/about
Download the Armor of Truth Mobile App Free
NEW! AoT Locals
NEW! AoT Telegram
Armor of Truth, Inc is a 501(c)(3) Non Profit Organization
Donations are tax deductible
By supporting Armor of Truth you are helping to reach thousands of people daily with the Gospel of Jesus Christ and encouragement to persevere in a world that is hostile to the gospel. Please consider making a donation to help support this mission.
Support Armor of Truth, official donation page: Donate