Is the world witnessing the rise of a benevolent response to the New World Order?
Is the BRICS bloc of nations the “new axis of evil”?
“A critical moment in the creation of a new world order may have just occurred.” — Steven Gruzd, South African Institute of International Affairs (after August BRICS summit)
“The naive believes everything, But the sensible man considers his steps.” — Proverbs 14:15
Since the time of Babel, men have continued to band themselves together against God believing that a coalition united against God has a better chance than one leader. In their vanity and ignorance, they oppose God’s design and they hate Christ, thinking Him to be a slave driver, which exposes their spiritual insanity. God is a breaker of bondage, not a maker of bondage. Psalm 2 says that God laughs at the fruitless efforts of corrupt leaders to work against Him. Theologian James Boice said,
“God does not tremble, counting the enemy and calculating whether or not he has sufficient force to counter this new challenge to his kingdom. He does not even rise from where he is sitting. He simply ‘laughs’ at these great imbeciles.”
Through the centuries, many have opposed God and His Kingdom in Jesus Christ. Each one of these opponents has been and shall be frustrated and crushed.
In late August, a confederacy of controversial contenders speaking for roughly half the global population wrapped up their fifteenth summit of member nations in Johannesburg, South Africa. Six eccentric member nations were added to an already ill-defined faction, and the cranky cadre re-stated their collective goal: end Western unipolar dominance (translation: bring down the USA). Where is all this headed? Hint: Think post-World War 2, Soviet Union and USA, only this time with blocs or groups of nations rather than singular superpowers.
Now, you’re likely already aware that whenever there’s a significant development on the global chessboard, there is an orthodox (accepted mainstream) narrative, approved alternative narratives, and then there’s the truth — and they do not often overlap.
The Western corporate media frames BRICS as a threat to American stability. Most BRICS reps are eager to wear that label. Our primary concern with this piece is to ask and answer why the establishment is pushing BRICS as the rise of an adversarial system to the West. After the BRICS summit, CBS News reported:
“Some of the past week's developments will likely raise some serious questions for the U.S.”
Since BRICS is not a strategic military alliance but rather an attempt at an economic alliance, most of the reports claim that BRICS is a threat to the US dollar as the global reserve currency and that such a thing places the American way of life in peril. Former Trump advisor Joseph Sullivan writing for ForeignPolicy.com in April 2023, said,
“A BRICS-issued currency would be different. It’d be like a new union of up-and-coming discontents who [...] now collectively outweigh not only the reigning hegemon, the United States, but the entire G-7…”
Robert Kiyosaki, multi-millionaire and the best-selling author of Rich Dad Poor Dad tweeted ahead of the BRICS summit,
“The U.S. dollar 'will die' with BRICS new currency.”
Some of BRICS’ similarly ambitious past projects to thwart dominant Western infrastructures have failed. In 2018, the group aspired to develop a BRICS credit rating agency, and a BRICS undersea cable scheduled for completion in 2015 never materialized. Such grand-scale international ventures require close relations between collaborators. A quick scan of the roster of BRICS member nations explains why the requisite trust and cooperation for such a significant creation is just not there and not likely to be anytime soon, least of all a gold-backed global currency.
Former Bank of America strategist David Woo called the notion of a BRICS currency backed by gold “senseless.” Woo argued that there is no need for another gold derivative in the market and noted that it isn’t clear what the BRICS nations would achieve by creating one. Backing a new BRICS currency with gold reserves would actually weaken the individual currencies of many member nations, and harm BRICS nations.
Just as there seemed to be no clear objective to the addition of those six specific new member states to the bloc other than a shared dislike of the US, BRICS leaders seem to be less inspired to act in the best interest of all member nations by setting reachable goals and establishing sound policies and more inspired to expressed animosity for the West. This is not a viable platform for creating a world superpower and equal counterpart to Western hegemony.
In 2014, the leaders of the BRICS created a New Development Bank (NDB) with $50 billion in initial capital from China. The bank was created to give BRICS leaders more control over the development finance of infrastructure and sustainable development projects in member nations and other low-and-middle-income countries (take note of the “sustainable development” mention). The hope was these BRICS institutions would challenge the dominance of the West, the World Bank, and the IMF and, over time, become a significant player in infrastructure funding, potentially surpassing the World Bank. However, there were immediate and lasting concerns about transparency, monitoring of loans, and potential disagreements among BRICS members, primarily due to China's dominant economic position within the group. Again, disparate ideologies, worldviews, cultures, and strategic goals come into direct conflict on a major BRICS initiative.
BRICS is a bizarre bag of misfitting puzzle pieces, at best. The narrative projected from the corporate media suggests that BRICS nations are unified and share a common purpose. This is false on its face. How likely is it that India and China will settle their border disputes to join arms against the West when they can’t find agreement on rudimentary border disputes? Why would a world-leading economic force burn money on pipe dreams, bad ideas, obstacles, delays, and unnecessary costs when they could much more easily just do business with the West and take advantage of its established tried-and-true infrastructure as they have for many decades of prosperity? What is the actual incentive for any of this beyond perceived anger at the West (that is being suspiciously elevated by the media)?
Throw the name Vladimir Putin in the mix or Ali Khamenei of the Islamic Republic of Iran, and even if those autocratic rulers aren’t particularly personally interested in BRICS, suddenly, the bloc looks a lot like a “new axis of evil.” On September 11, 2023, Tennessee Senator Marsha Blackburn released a statement on her website referring to BRICS as just that,
“In the latest example of the New Axis of Evil’s growing strength, the BRICS group recently decided to accept Iran – a U.S.-designated State Sponsor of Terrorism – and Saudi Arabia into the fold. The group’s increased control over the world’s oil production will give them more economic and political strength which should worry the U.S. and our allies.”
“The increasing aggressiveness of the New Axis of Evil is proof that America’s adversaries are undeterred […] and their resolve to achieve global domination grows stronger every day.”
For some reason, they want you to believe that Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, and now Argentina, Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates present a clear and present collective threat. We must not forget our history, or we’re likely to repeat the worst parts of it. Where have we seen this kind of thing before? Again, think Soviet Union, post World War 2.
What is BRICS?
In 2001, Jim O’Neill, an analyst for Goldman Sachs, coined the original “BRIC” acronym when he observed that the economies of Brazil, Russia, India, and China accounted for about 23% of global GDP and could be a powerful collective economic player on the world stage — nothing more than an observation, as O’Neill himself stated.
The 4 original countries formed an informal group in 2006 as economic allies, and when South Africa joined in 2010, the BRIC became BRICS. The 2023 South African Summit saw the addition of Iran, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Argentina, Egypt, and Ethiopia. So, the acronym has now grown by one more symbol to BRICS+. (I can’t help it: Doesn’t that seem strangely similar to LGBTQ+? I digress.)
Global GDP (Gross Domestic Product) is an overview of economic health and growth, calculating the total market value of all goods and services produced worldwide in one year. This figure is typically reported by The World Bank, International Monetary Fund (IMF), and other international agencies to help governments, policymakers, investors, and other stakeholders understand economic trends and make informed decisions.
The global economy (GDP) as of 2022 was $94 trillion. The BRICS nations account for over 25% of the global economy ($20 trillion) and 40.4% of the global population (3.195 billion). In January 2022, the GDP of the BRICS nations breaks down as follows in US dollars:
China: 14.34 trillion Population: 1.411 billion
India: 2.87 trillion Population: 1.366 billion
Brazil: 1.45 trillion Population: 213 million
Russia: 1.47 trillion Population: 145 million
South Africa: ($320 million) Population: 60 million
China holds all the cards in the BRICS, yet Xi Jinping could not be bothered to attend the 2023 summit. When O’Neill said that the BRIC(S) nations accounted for 23% of world GDP, he referred to the combined economic output of all member countries within that particular group. The focus on GDP data as an indicator of the bloc’s potential as a global force is limited and deceiving. For example, GDP offers no insight into the quality of life or the well-being of the people who live and work in these various economies.
Economist Jim O’Neill, the man who coined the term BRIC in a 2001 paper, said in a recent article at chathamhouse.org,
Over the past two decades, some have …interpreted [my thesis] as an endorsement of the BRICS. [...] But I never intended any such thing. On the contrary, ever since the Brazilian and Russian foreign ministers proposed the idea of creating a formal BRIC political grouping in 2009, I have questioned the organization's purpose, beyond serving as a symbolic gesture. Now that the BRICS has announced that it will add six more countries … I pose the question again. [...] The decision, after all, does not appear to have been decided on any clear objective, much less economic, criteria. Why, for example, was Indonesia not asked? Why Argentina and not Mexico, or Ethiopia and not Nigeria?
It is true that in terms of purchasing power parity, the BRICS are slightly larger than the G7. But, because their currencies trade at prices far below their PPP-implied levels, the group remains significantly smaller than its advanced-economy counterpart, when measured in current nominal US dollars.
But none of the other BRICS has performed anywhere near as well as these two. Brazil and Russia account for around the same share of global GDP as they did in 2001, and South Africa is not even the largest economy in Africa (Nigeria has passed RSA).
Just as China dominates the BRICS by dint of being twice the size of all the others combined, so the US is now bigger than the rest of the G7 combined. The US and China dominate their respective groups even more than they did in the past.
Neither the G7 nor the BRICS (expanded or otherwise) makes much sense for tackling today's global challenges.
What these dynamics suggest is that neither the G7 nor the BRICS (expanded or otherwise) makes much sense for tackling today's global challenges. Neither can do much without the direct, equal involvement of the other.
What the world really needs is a resurrected G20, which already includes all the same key players, plus others. It remains the best forum for addressing truly global issues such as economic growth, international trade, climate change, pandemic prevention, and so on.
At some point, the US and China will have to overcome their differences and allow the G20 to return to its central position.
As for the BRICS, the group could be more effective, on the margins, if key members were truly serious about pursuing shared goals.
But China and India rarely agree on anything […] neither is likely to be enthusiastic about the other gaining more influence…
While O’Neill’s enthusiasm for the original concept might have waned over the years, the BRIC(S) term stuck.
Foremost, the BRICS is an intergovernmental economic and political organization officially formed in September 2006 at the 61st session of the United Nations General Assembly to “work together to provide more representation of the developing world and the Global South in world affairs.”
For a clear picture of what BRICS is beyond the corporate and alternative media, there is much to be learned from the statements and sentiments released by attendees and interested global players after the Summit closed.
Günther Maihold from the German Institute for International and Security Affairs, speaking for the Council on Foreign Relations, said after the recent BRICS Summit:
“The fifteenth BRICS summit will be remembered …as a summit of complaints against the West… What some observers call a negative coalition of states that cannot agree on a common position, but can create a consensus on what they oppose, is growing in number to avoid sanctions and protectionist measures.
The old scripts of belonging to a certain order are no longer valid [...] pointing clearly to the urgent need to reorder international relations to overcome the self-referentiality of the West.”
How’s that for a mission statement? “We don’t really know what we are but know who we hate!” Does that sound like a confident, goal-oriented statement of economic purpose?
Navdeep Suri of India said of the Summit:
“The fifteenth BRICS summit has gone further than any other in the recent past to modernize and galvanize the grouping. It has sent a strong signal that the post–World War II order should accept the multipolar reality and change with the times.”
Why Brics Will Not Succeed
The BRICS nations represent an extreme diversity of varying economic strengths and structures, cultures, and contradicting worldviews which are significant and likely insurmountable obstacles to economic global dominance.
Consider China’s economy, which is more than twice the size of all other BRICS economies combined and almost entirely controlled by the Chinese Communist Party. The success of the BRICS+ is utterly reliant on the transparency and survival of the Chinese system.
Likewise, the Chinese must be willing to carry much more responsibility and advocate justly for the other bloc nations. Are the Chinese likely to deal honestly and make sacrifices for the good of the bloc? Is the CCP a trustworthy partner for any developing nation without a real military option to keep them honest?
Additionally, the Chinese Communist Party openly restricts religious freedom, promotes assimilation into Chinese-style communist ideology, and is well known to be a violator of human rights, as are several other BRICS nations. This is not good for business!
How bad is China today?
A report from the US State Department reveals that since April 2017, the Chinese government has detained over a million Uyghur Muslims, members of other Muslim groups, Falun Gong members, and Christians in internment camps in the Xinjiang region under counterterrorism and counter-extremism policies where “reeducation” into Chinese Communist Party (CCP) ideologies is common. The actual number of detainees is likely much higher. According to satellite imagery data, there are known to have been 385 detention centers built or expanded from 2017 to 2021.
The CCP is known to kidnap, torture, physically and psychologically abuse, force labor, force sterilization, neglect medical attention, use extensive surveillance, and prolong the detention of prisoners without trial due to their religion and ethnicity.
The Chinese government justifies their actions as measures against “religious extremism and violent terrorism.” This systematic abuse has led several organizations to accuse the Chinese government of committing crimes against humanity and genocide.
How will the other nations of the bloc, Muslim, Hindu, and Christian, justify their collaboration with a nation that hates their faith and their people?
BRICS+ nations also have conflicting strategic interests, geopolitical objectives, and socio-economic goals. The obstacles to a unified stance on global issues by BRICS+ are obvious.
Jhanvi Tripathi, Associate Fellow at the Geoeconomics Programme, Observer Research Foundation in India, provided this “optimistic” review of the recent BRICS Summit:
Even the profile of the new members suggests that the system is headed for something beyond traditionally “acceptable” partners in the eyes of the West. The presence of Iran especially and the reactions to it in the coming days will be interesting to follow.
She’s not joking. She believes that line. She has to. She’s speaking on behalf of India at the Council on Foreign Relations. But how seriously can we take such a statement given Iran’s history of engagement with blocs, Western-style economic systems, and cultures that hate Islam (China et al.)?
The institutional framework and mechanisms for coordination among BRICS nations would need to become more developed and more robust than established international groupings like the European Union. That day is not coming in the near or even moderately distant future.
Each BRICS nation faces specific economic challenges like vast disparities in wealth, unemployment, inflation, and the weight of massive debt, which will undoubtedly hinder the collective economic stability and growth of the bloc.
Divergent, even counter-productive approaches to foreign policy between member states will certainly hamstring attempts at coordination and consensus of necessary diplomacy within the bloc.
Extremely divergent stages of development between member states will impede the ability of the bloc to prioritize and align on issues such as industrial growth, technological innovation, social welfare, etc.
Changes in the global economic landscape, the rise of other nations, and more cohesive groupings of nations in emerging markets will work against the relative influence of the precariously discordant BRICS bloc on the world stage.
The glaring lack of shared identity, history, and values is perhaps the most obvious problem with the BRICS bloc. Without a cohesive sense of solidarity and common purpose among its member states, how can the BRICS be seriously considered as a real challenger to the global order?
While the BRICS nations collectively represent a significant share of the world's population and economic activity, there are simply too many challenges and limitations to establishing a fully integrated and influential bloc on the global stage.
Overcoming these challenges would require decades of diligence, enhanced cooperation, coordination, and building trust and consensus among the member states. However, with the litany of demographic disparities, social dissimilarities, and cultural contradictions visible on just the surface of the BRICS nations’ analysis, the necessary cohesiveness, coordination, and patience to get it done would be extremely difficult in favorable times of peace, prosperity, and trust in leadership. Given today’s global economic and political climate, and when trust in leadership is at historic lows, the BRICS is nothing more than an Eastern fairy tale and no threat to Western hegemony.
Still, the bought-and-paid-for mainstream media and a disappointing swath of so-called alternative media are reporting that the BRICS bloc has appeared just in time to be the remedy to the scourge of the established world order of the Geneva-based Babelites and their mighty city and tower complex of health tyranny, economic stricture, and digital ghettos.
In a recent conversation with Tucker Carlson on X, Presidential candidate Robert Kennedy, Jr. confidently affirmed, “Vladimir Putin is engineering the BRICS.” Bobby Jr. surely knows better than this. As if Putin has the time, energy, resources, or desire to captain an even larger sinking ship than the one he’s hanging onto right now. So, why did he say it? To be sure, Kennedy has said some strange things and contradicted himself several times in the last year, and not on insignificant matters. For example, Kennedy has flip-flopped on climate change more than a few times. But, again, I digress. That’s a topic for another day.
Regarding Putin, geopolitical strategist Peter Zeihan writes that Vladimir Putin is,
“following a well-trod path mapped out for him by the former Soviet Union and its heavy-handed imperial predecessor. The Russian center maintains absolute control, and internal threats are crushed. Like his predecessors, Putin must maintain a sprawling internal security apparatus and intelligence service to infiltrate and eliminate any would-be competitors or questioners of his rule.”
So, the person who trusts Kennedy today must believe that Vladimir Putin is focused on concerted economic and social development with a motley crew of calamitous collaborators, a virtual who’s who of the world’s worst authoritarian regimes. No. No. Say it ain’t so, Bobby! Tucker should know better, too. Who do these guys work for? You tell me.
What Putin has accomplished is to stay in power, virtually unchallenged, for decades. But therein lies the plain-as-the-nose-on-your-face downfall of Putin and the core of the BRICS bloc; the focused concentration of authority within the hands of a chosen few. It cannot be denied that Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping share a taste for authoritarianism. Xi prefers his with a totalitarian cherry on top. All the while, both of these throwbacks to 20th-century communism do their bidding camouflaged in the business attire of the West.
No, Putin doesn’t care about the BRICS psyop; he already has his hands full bailing water out of the quickly-sinking SS Kremlin. We know this because of the recent “clandestine” meeting Putin had with Kim Jong Un in Eastern Russia to broker a deal for more shells to be lofted into Ukraine. Russia has spent its cache of shells and is entertaining the possibility of accepting shells and soldiers from North Korea. All Putin has to barter, that North Korea cares anything about, are nukes and satellite technology. Now, there’s a happy combo for a psychopathic dictator.
Behold, just a few headlines:
September 11, 2023: Kim Jong Un tells Putin that Russia will win 'great victory' over enemies
September 13, 2023: Putin says Russia could help North Korea build satellites
September 13, 2023: North Korea’s Kim tells Putin deepening ties is ‘number one priority’
September 14, 2023: Kremlin reports: Putin, and Kim Jong Un gifted each other rifles
September 14, 2023: Putin accepts Kim Jong Un’s invitation to visit North Korea
September 18, 2023: North Korean leader ends Russia trip with ‘heartfelt thanks’ to Putin
So, this is the system they want you and me to believe is building itself into an economic powerhouse fit to overtake the Western hegemony. Sure it is.
Vladimir Putin is not at all interested in managing the Bad News Bears. But we certainly cannot pat Vlad on the back for teaming up with Un. When lies dominate, a man will make strange allies. To whom is Putin listening?
“If a ruler listens to lies, all his officials become wicked.” — Proverbs 29:12
For that matter, Xi Jinping isn’t interested in leading the BRICS either. He, too, has bigger fish to fry. China is on the eve of a demographic collapse like history has never seen. Peter Zeihan reports,
It’s time to come out from under your rock and face the music – China is collapsing. If that comes as a shock to you, it's because the Chinese have concealed this reasonably well. Whether you look at it from a domestic or international point of view, the Chinese system is riddled with economic issues, a crumbling political system, awful demographics, and a long list of other problems.
For three years, China was able to hide everything behind the facade of COVID. Any sort of statistical release or news out of China was always viewed through the eyes of COVID. If there was bad news, you could always lay that at the altar of COVID. Now we’re getting our first good look into the Chinese system in years, and there has been a significant shift.
In his first five years, Chairman Xi ran a series of purges under the guise of a corruption removal campaign. He removed every regional power center so none could ever rise to national prominence. Next, he gutted the two factions of the previous presidents, Hu Jintao and Jiang Zemin, to make sure they could never come back.
We’ve seen an ever-tightening information vacuum across the Chinese space. Xi has spent the last couple of years gutting the bureaucrats and the private sector of anyone who might be able to rise to national prominence. He’s removed certain sources of data collection to make sure that they can’t assist anyone in rising to prominence. No local or younger politician has a way to rise in prominence to become a potential rival. All of these things have been going on for five and six years.
The most recent, full data to be released by the Chinese in the last two to three months tells us that the birth rate has dropped in China by nearly 70% since 2017. That’s the fastest drop in all of recorded history. The peak of workforce-age citizens peaked at some point during that timeframe.
They don’t have enough millennials to consume goods and the cost of the workforce has increased by a factor of 14 or 15 in the last 22 years. So in the last five or six years, China has already fallen off the cliff and it’s only in the last few months that it’s become so obvious that the Chinese system is breaking down and the demographic collapse is not correctable, even if they suddenly allowed or encouraged people to have bigger families.
So, demographically speaking, we know that this is China’s final decade as a coherent economic power.
Take note: population control is always the death knell of any “great” society, and China is about to wear the shame of 20th-century democidal tyrannies. Stay tuned!
What about India? They can lead the BRICS. Really? No. Notice the population of India mentioned above: India has more than 1.3 billion mouths to feed and a GDP of 2.8 trillion. China has 1.4 billion mouths to feed and a GDP of 14.3 trillion. If China is in a steep and irreversible dive, how can India be expected to provide leadership for a global opposition to the Western hegemony? We’d be pleased for them to remain focused on their own people. They must.
How about South Africa? Well, if you didn’t know it yet, RSA was captured by the WEF in the 1990s when Klaus Schwab courted Nelson Mandela, who then promptly sold his birthright to the Geneva-based Babelites for a pot of stew. This means there is no actual leadership in South Africa. So, no. (see the video below)
Brazil? No. The South American nation has very little to offer in leadership and like most of the other BRICS nations, is just trying to keep the lights on.
For a time in late 2022 and early 2023, the narrative the alt media sold us was that BRICS would bring back the gold standard. A gold-backed currency, you say! Happy days are here again! That will surely woo the world, crush the Western hegemony, and squeeze the life out of the New World Order! No. The global economy is so bloated now that there isn’t enough gold on the planet to back any global currency.
The world has far outstretched itself in economic progress upon progress to the point where now, fiat currency is the only viable option - or crypto or some form of digital currency.
We’ve already established how dire the circumstances are for the BRICS nations. Adding gold derivatives to the market will only harm the currencies of developing countries by devaluing their currencies. Likewise, the BRICS organizing and implementing a digital currency of their own without help from the Western Geneva-based Babelite hegemony isn’t happening.
So, How can the BRICS be taken seriously as a viable threat to the dollar, the West, or anything for that matter?
Peter Zeihan says it quite well,
“Have you ever seen a couple of 3-year-olds sitting on the playground talking gibberish and acting like they’re making life-changing decisions? Well, that’s what’s going on at the BRICS summit… (August 25th).
If you’re struggling to find some overlap between [BRICS] countries…you’re not alone. This group of countries struggles to connect on anything meaningful.
To complicate matters further, [BRICS added] to their ranks: Iran, Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Egypt, Ethiopia, and Argentina. I urge you to try and come up with a worse list of mid-tier countries to bring on if you want to expand your geopolitical influence.
The varying interests of the current and new members will likely halt any meaningful conversation. The practical significance of BRICS as a whole is – limited – to say the least. And if you were hoping this would shake up the global landscape, I’m sorry to burst your bubble.”
What’s the true purpose of BRICS?
There’s this wide-eyed notion that BRICS is the answer to the New World Order! This bloc of go-getter nations will rise and thwart globalism establishing a multipolar world order to finally put the Rockefellers and Rothschilds global banksters in their place.
To cure this mad hallucination, you need not look any further than the BRICS's own publicly stated agenda from the recent summit in Johannesburg. For all to behold, the mighty counternarrative to globalism presented their front-facing univocal position statement on important matters like “sustainability” and the importance of the UN and the WHO.
The Second Johannesburg Declaration of the BRICS countries, also known as:
“The Johannesburg II Declaration — BRICS and Africa: Partnership for Mutually Accelerated Growth, Sustainable Development, and Inclusive Multilateralism.”
Thanks to Edward Slavsquat on Substack for this helpful summary:
The UN is the cornerstone of the “international system,” and BRICS members are committed to the full “implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.”
“Public-private partnerships” will help ensure “sustainable development,” and BRICS is excited about the work of its Task Force on Public-Private Partnership.
The IMF and WTO are valued organizations, but they must be more “inclusive” and “non-discriminatory”.
“We commit to intensify our efforts towards improving our collective capacity for global pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response, and strengthening our ability to fight back any such pandemics in the future collectively.”
“Climate change” is referred to 18 times.
BRICS is excited about “digital transformation in education” and “sustainable education.”
A lot of other feel-good word-salad about making the world a better, more inclusive, and sustainable place by partnering with corporations and strengthening global governance.
In total, “sustainable development” is mentioned 21 times. (The acronym “SDG” appears 6 times.)
Of course, what makes BRICS special and different is that it promises to carry out a friendly global agenda aimed at crushing your soul in an “integrated and holistic manner.”
Isn’t that a much better New World Order than the other one? (pardon the satire)
The BRICS was originally a thesis suggested by a financial analyst (from the Western hegemony, mind you). Today, it is another tentacle of the same Geneva-based Babelites (WEF, WTC, UN, etc.). Whatever its humble beginnings, BRICS is now just another global power grab and wealth extraction machine for the 1%.
Russia, China, and others within the BRICS are in complete alignment with the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals, the WEF’s goals, and the totalitarian designs of the WHO’s Pandemic treaty.
The BRICS alliance is not a real alternative to globalism, in fact, in our opinion, BRICS is a qualified Psyop, yet another attempt at false foil to the Western order that, if played properly, would serve the elites just as well or even better than the Soviet Union did after World War 2.
Consider this revealing statement after the Summit by Russian Council on Foreign and Defense Policy, Fyodor Lukyanov:
“Judging by the set of first invitees, no clear membership criteria is established, only the matter of agreement among those at the table. Only one condition applies—no binding relations with the West.”
Spoken like a Rockefeller. The G20 and the BRICS are both (and all) busy as bees, working to implement the 100-year plan Agenda 21 Sustainable Development with equal enthusiasm. High-tech solutions to lo-tech problems, total surveillance, and full-spectrum dominance of the earth and all its creatures.
Have we such short memories that we’ve all forgotten how the same interests formed, financed, and profited from the creation of the Soviet Union as a perfect foil to the Shining City on a Hill that once was the United States?
Have we forgotten the Bushes and the Union Banking Corp? The Rockefellers, Carnegies, Fords, and the tax-free foundation racket established for the very purpose of fomenting rivalry between the world’s designed superpowers? Have we forgotten how those same elite families financed and forced the dumbing down of the American populous into an unthinking workforce with compulsory public education?
John D. Rockefeller, the patriarch of the Rockefeller political dynasty and former richest man on Earth, donated millions of dollars to move the education of children out of the hands of families and to further the “Prussian military-style” model of public education in America.
Rockefeller created The General Education Board (GEB) in 1903 which was devoted to the cause of “public education in the South” and the “improvement (control) of medical education.”
Rockefeller made an initial commitment of $1 million to the organization which quickly grew to $43 million in just five years — at the time, the largest gift to a philanthropic organization in the history of the United States (his own org).
The GEB had faced persistent allegations that while it opened doors to poor children, it clearly closed doors to any other area a student might choose to pursue; “it is with the belief that a student's lot was known and that there the future lay.”
In the history of philosophy, this is known as master and slave morality. Some are born to be slaves and must not aspire beyond their circumstances. The wealthy landowners were ordained as such by divine right.
If you had forgotten this, you would be forgiven. Our world is a never-ending deluge of bad and worse news poured down on us from on high from the corporate, bought-and-paid-for, CIA, Project Mockingbird media.
Are you still buying the false front they’re selling that the BRICS nations are an organic uprising of nations who have finally had enough of the Western hegemony and intend to establish a viable multipolar world order to crush globalism?
By now, you should know better. No more excuses.
“The simple inherit folly, but the prudent are crowned with knowledge.”
— Proverbs 14:18
As promised, the following is a collection of video lectures and reports that detail the claims made above and serve as an archive, reminder, or primer on why you must never blindly trust the official narrative.
The Best Enemies Money Can Buy: An Interview with Prof. Antony C. Sutton
How American interests established and profited from the “Soviet Threat” as an antithesis to freedom.
Norman Dodd On Tax Exempt Foundations
How foundations run by Rockefeller, Carnegie, etc. used their vast wealth reserves to form and control the world they saw fit and disguised it as altruism.
Is Italy also like South Africa? - Interview with Fahrie Hassan A highly informative presentation on how South Africa was captured by the WEF decades ago.
STATS AND FIGURES
Don’t stop there! Please read the following prepared by Brad:
Psalm 2
“Why do the nations rage and the peoples of the world plot in vain? The kings of the earth set themselves against the Lord, and the rulers take counsel together against his Anointed, saying, “Let us burst their bonds apart and cast away their cords from us.”
He who sits in the heavens laughs. The Lord holds them in derision. He will speak to them in his wrath, and terrify them in his fury, saying, “As for me, I have set my King on Zion, my holy hill.”
I will tell of the decree: The LORD said to me, “You are my Son; today I have begotten you. Ask of me, and I will make the nations your heritage and the ends of the earth your possession. You shall break them with a rod of iron and dash them in pieces like a potter’s vessel.”
Therefore, O kings, be wise; be warned, O rulers of the earth. Serve the LORD with fear, and rejoice with trembling. Kiss/Submit to the Son, lest he be angry, and you perish in the way, for his wrath is quickly kindled.
Blessed are all who take refuge in him.”
God looks at the way man plots against Him and he isn’t afraid or put off by such opposition. God sits as the Great King on a glorious throne. He does not fret or wring His hands in the throne room of heaven wondering what He should do next. God sits in perfect peace and assurance with authority over all creation.
“This derisive laughter of God is the comfort of all those who love righteousness.” (Morgan)
The Roman Emperor Diocletian (A.D. 284-305) was a nasty opponent of Christianity and persecuted the church mercilessly. At one point, he believed that he had defeated Christianity once and for all and ordered the striking of a medal with the inscription: “The name of Christianity being extinguished.” he also erected two monuments with these inscriptions:
“Diocletian Jovian Maximian Herculeus Caesares Augusti for having extended the Roman Empire in the east and the west and for having extinguished the name of Christians who brought the Republic to ruin.”
“Diocletian Jovian Maximian Herculeus Caesares Augusti for having everywhere abolished the superstition of Christ for having extended the worship of the gods.”
Diocletian has been dead for nearly two millennia and I’ll bet you didn’t even know who he was. But, the fame and glory of Jesus Christ is known everywhere, over all the earth. “The LORD shall hold them in derision.”
“Christ holds the nations as His inheritance. He will rule over all nations and all judgment is committed to Him” (John 5:22).
“Then the seventh angel blew his trumpet, and there were loud voices in heaven, saying, ‘The kingdom of the world has become the kingdom of our Lord and of his Christ, and he shall reign forever and ever.’” (Revelation 11:15)
Christ has such matchless power over the nations, that there is no reason and no benefit to defiant opposition. Psalm 2 warns rulers and kings of the earth to give up their foolish defiance of the LORD and calls them to surrender to God, and to give Him proper reverence. Then, and only then, they can rejoice, but with appropriate trembling. God requires it of every one of His people. God desires for us to recognize our proper place before Him, but to also rejoice in Him and be affectionate in our relationship with Him.
Those who defy the Living God will be broken, but those who submit and depend on Him will be blessed.
King David, under inspiration of God, leaves the choice with you: will you be broken or blessed?
