Theocracy, Pornography, and America’s Forgotten First Amendment
Dusty Deevers’ Viral Sermon and Ban on Porn Enrages Progressives
“Our Loving Crucified Resurrected Warrior King Jesus”
Dusty Deevers rings a bell that must be rung, and his message comes at a time when Christian men need to be shaken awake and reminded of their duty as disciples of Christ. This is a man of God preaching a specific sermon for other men of God at a time most necessary.
Shorter length video below of the full version of the show
By Brad Ward, Director, Armor of Truth
He might as well have declared himself Dusty bin Laden and announced his plot to overthrow the government. Deever’s sermon, titled “Men of War” (link below), based on 2 Timothy 2:1-7 “A Good Soldier of Christ Jesus” (ESV), was given near Georgetown, Texas at the Blueprints for Christendom 2.0. Conference. Clips of the sermon spread like wildfire on social media, gaining over 1.5 million views so far.
Deevers was elected to a senate seat in the Oklahoma House of Reps in December, 2023. After winning the senate race, Deevers posted on social media,
“Here in Oklahoma, it’s time to abolish abortion, abolish pornography, abolish the state income tax, and give power and equal representation back to the people!”
While abolishing the state income tax would likely be a popular platform in any state, Deevers’ mission to abolish abortion and ban pornography in Oklahoma has earned the ire of many influencers and celebrities. Former SNL star and late-night talk show host Jimmy Fallon does a weird and cringeworthy bit about Deevers that amounts to a rude and vindictive personal attack.
Jimmy Fallon Crude and Unfunny Attack on Deevers
https://x.com/dustydeevers/status/1762859818195312654?s=46&t=aVtDBXEaFQ56klcvQYNurQ
This vile nonsense only serves as evidence to support Deevers’ assertion that porn not only corrupts the individual but is corrosive to culture in general. The effects of what we do in private can be seen in our public policies and what passes for entertainment.
Deevers’ response to @jimmyfallon and his writers:
“...I mourn the cost of enumerable people enticed into and trapped in pornography’s banquet in the grave and the fact that Jimmy Fallon serves that banquet as a waiter. …I long to see singlehood, marriages, families, and futures rescued from the poisonous promises of porn’s insatiable appetite for increasing deviance and destruction. …my prayer for our nation and for Jimmy Fallon. Come to Jesus and live.”
When someone speaks so plainly and boldly from God’s word, as Deevers does, in today’s culture he is sure to be targeted for mockery, reviling, and even removal.
Oklahoma State Senator Wants to Criminalize Porn & Sexting Outside of Marriage
A brief scroll through the comments under a video like this will quickly reveal that the air in America is charged with a destructive discontent. We do not see “fundamentalist Christians” frothing at the mouth to overthrow the government and establish a theocracy, as the official narrative warns. Instead, we see a very real hatred for Christians and fundamentally American ideals, as well as vapid misconceptions about the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.
This national discontent can be traced back to the influence of state-mandated public education and the prevailing fallacy that relevance is the foundation of education. For a couple generations at least, rather than being taught the objective principles of truth, beauty, and goodness, our children have been trained like Pavlov’s dog to feel their way to truth, evaluating information according to its cultural relevance. These children are now the confused adults who run our country and shape the narrative in the public square. The truth of our condition is that very few can think through and productively debate issues of crucial importance such as the Establishment Clause and the role of faith in civic matters.
Egalitarianism initiated in the Enlightenment was a demand for sameness that yielded the Feminism that would come of age in the 19th century. The Enlightenment principle of equality resulted in the Reign of Terror. During that time, anyone who was deemed “privileged” or had anything to do with the church was removed or killed.
Hemant Mehta is a former Jeopardy champion, internet atheist, and popular social media influencer via his anti-religion blog The Friendly Atheist.
Hemant Mehta @hemantmehta
This intense sermon would be disturbing enough coming from a random pastor. It's even worse when you realize it's Oklahoma State Sen. Dusty Deevers calling on Christian men to go to war for Jesus. https://x.com/hemantmehta/status/1767926702024380525?s=46&t=aVtDBXEaFQ56klcvQYNurQ
Dusty Deevers @dustydeevers Response to Hemant Mehta: https://x.com/DustyDeevers/status/1769514216900174027?s=20
1.4M views . . . and I didn’t pay for a single one.
DISCLAIMER TO ALL CRITICS OF DEEVERS’ SERMON
It's no wonder that Hemant Mehta and a million others who worship the god of this world and are blinded to the gospel would presume to critique Deevers’ sermon as a message of oppressive theocratic impulse. But, there must be a qualification made here.
To professing atheists, secular humanists, cultural influencers, and anyone else who denies the sovereignty of God and the Kingship of Jesus Christ, this sermon is not for you. This might seem controversial at first, but I respectfully suggest that it is grossly inappropriate for anyone who is not a Christian man to offer their critical commentary of Deevers’ sermon. It’s not a political speech. It’s not a sermon for “far-right MAGA” supporters, or the Oklahoma House of Reps. It’s not a message for gay men, Trans-persons, atheists, or pundits, and it wasn’t preached to persuade Jimmy Fallon, The Friendly Atheist, or the writers of Rolling Stone Magazine. This sermon was written for a specific audience and with a specific application in mind and was not meant for the ears of anyone who is not a regenerate Christian man.
Dusty Deevers rings a bell that must be rung, and his message comes at a time when Christian men need to be shaken awake and reminded of their duty as disciples of Christ. This is a man of God preaching a specific sermon for other men of God to wake them up from their slumber, remind them to get their priorities straight, inspire them to be godly men seeking the Lord’s face daily, to be godly husbands loving their wives well and leading their homes according to the standard the Lord Jesus has set — sacrificially. A godly man will lay down his life for his wife and family because Jesus Christ laid down His life for the church. We are good soldiers for Christ when we leave this mark on the culture in which we live.
Teaching from the pulpit is intended for neither public consumption nor public criticism. You would think, as intelligent as Hemant Mehta is, as astute as the writers and editors of Rolling Stone surely must be, that they would know the difference between a Christian sermon and a political speech. The two are very different because they have different audiences in mind.
While a sermon for one’s flock is very different than a political speech, the man you see delivering the sermon and the man you see speaking on the House Floor is the same man with the same worldview. What seems to confuse and aggravate those who hate Deevers’ Christian convictions is his consistency. He does not leave Jesus outside the senate chamber any more than his political opponents and the LGB Trans-activists leave their cause outside the chamber.
Senators respond to being labeled 'terrorists' by Senate Pro Tem over filibuster actions
They’re all very religious, and they serve their god. The question is this: do they serve their god consistently? Or do they check which way the wind is blowing before choosing what to say? And when they do speak out, is it an original thought, or has someone trained and programmed them how to be relevant?
This state of affairs and the vitriolic reactions to Dusty Deevers’ stand for truth, beauty, and goodness is an example of the very kind of corruption he is fighting against, and evidence of the programming of our society to deny the conviction of conscience and act from the flesh. Would Deevers’ sermon have caught the public’s or offended anyone twenty, or even ten years ago? Unlikely. This reaction has been cultivated over decades of corruption and social engineering.
America has certainly changed. The grass withers, the flower falls, and man’s heart is blown around like dust in a tornado, but the Word of God stands, unchanged. The New Testament’s teaching that men’s hearts love darkness rather than light, and God’s sovereignty over government and all earthly institutions in 2024 is exactly the same as it was in 1924, as it was in 1824, as it was in 1124, as it was in AD 24…
“Your word, LORD, is eternal; it stands firm in the heavens.” (Psalm 119:89)
Jimmy Fallon, Hemant Mehta and millions more like them have been taught to identify the Christian worldview and the gospel as a threat to their Liberty.
Video clip of Deevers on the job in the OK senate speaking on the Doctrine of the Lesser Magistrate
Hemant Mehta wrote an article about Deevers recently on his blog. While reading it, I suggest you consider asking what is Hemant’s standard of truth? How does he evaluate another man’s truth claims?
Oklahoma GOP lawmaker wants to ban single people from sexting each other
Sen. Dusty Deevers' bill would ban adult content, even between consenting non-married adults
“Sen. Dusty Deevers won a special election in December to fill a vacant seat and he’s wasted no time in proposing batshit crazy legislation to impose his Christian views across the state. (This is the same guy who, in 2022, delivered a sermon in which he railed against in vitro fertilization (IVF), said embryos “were incarcerated in frozen prisons…)”
“...it’s a very convenient way to make sure reading the Bible, with its incest and sex crimes, isn’t criminalized.”
“It’s the fulfillment of a campaign promise Deevers made to “abolish pornography.”
“The bill also makes it illegal to “distribute any unlawful pornography”… unless you’re married.”
“Which, in English, means you wouldn’t be able to sext anyone other than your spouse. And if you do (and you’re convicted in court), you face up to 20 years in prison or a fine of up to $25,000.”
“...What about married couples in open relationships? Doesn’t matter. What about adults who just enjoy exhibitionism and like sharing nude pictures of themselves online? Doesn’t matter. Essentially, Oklahomans with an OnlyFans account would be breaking the law despite not harming anybody.”
“The concern is that people like Deevers are on a mission to legislate their personal Christian morality… or at least the version of it they pretend to have in public. (Anyone voting for this bill ought to be fully transparent about their internet search histories.)”
The assertion that porn doesn’t “harm anybody” is empirically false. The notion that Deevers is somehow doing something unacceptable by “legislat[ing] their personal Christian morality.” That is exactly what every other member of congress does. They all work for legislation that aligns with their worldview.
Mehta makes plenty of assertions about how “bat-shit” crazy Deevers’ ideas are. However, we never receive any assurance as to why Mehta’s standard of truth is any better, just that Deevers is definitely wrong. Being disgusted by someone else’s position is neither a valid argument against it nor an argument for why one’s position is preferable. Mehta presents nothing more than an opinion — a very weak one.
WATCH: Deevers Campaign Message
In early February, Rolling Stone magazine published an article on Deevers in which they do a pretty good job stating his positions. Although they meant it as an insult, assuming their readers are ignorant of biblical principles, they mostly repeat sound biblical doctrine to their readership. (see Genesis 50:20)
ROLLING STONE: This Lawmaker Wants to Jail People for Watching Porn
February 2, 2024
Oklahoma lawmaker Dusty Deevers is a hardcore Christian nationalist who believes the government should “terrorize evildoers”
GRAPHIC: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GFYf9fqWMAA4xJR?format=jpg&name=900x900
Deevers responded in detail to much of the article via his X feed.
12 Brief Notes on the @RollingStone article.
https://x.com/DustyDeevers/status/1753626779716124715?s=20
1. I’ve cut my own hair since I was a junior in high school. Thanks for the compliment. Also, my jackets are not tailored. Maybe someday.
RS: [Deevers is a]“...hardcore Christian nationalist who believes the government should ‘terrorize evildoers.’” and doesn’t “...see any firewalls that are provided to me by the scriptures.”
2. Unsurprisingly, you missed my distinction on “firewalls” between the church and state and what it means that civil servants, through just law and enforcement, “terrorize evildoers.”
The church bears the “sword of the Spirit,” the Word of God (Ephesians 6:17), for conversion of heart, construction of holy living, and correction of sin. Civil servants bear the sword of justice to protect innocent people’s God-given rights to life, liberty, and property and inflict “God’s wrath upon wrongdoers.” In this way just law and punishment terrorize evildoers. This is simply Romans 13:1-4.
While there is a distinction between the roles and tools of the church and state, there is no firewall between God’s rule over the church and His rule over the state because Christ is King over all by His essential rule as God and His mediatorial rule as God-Man.
All things were created by, for, and through Christ, He rules over all things
“in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or rulers or authorities” (Colossians 1:16).
RS: “[Deevers] represents the bleeding edge of a far-right Christian movement that seeks to put the force of law behind its fundamentalist theology — and woe be to any nonbelievers.”
5. You’re wrong here. Our message is not “woe be to any nonbelievers,” but Come to Christ and know forgiveness of sins, eternal life in the fullness of joy. Also, Christians are offering to protect all people’s God-given rights with equal weights and measures for all.
“When the righteous increase, the people rejoice, but when the wicked rule, the people groan” (Proverbs 29:2).
6. “elder millennial vibes” Sounds cool.
GRAPHIC: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GFYgzNQXYAAkMXa?format=jpg&name=900x900
RS: “Deevers embodies a threat that experts believe Christian nationalism poses to democracy - by literally demonizing his opponents, and casting compromise as moral corruption. His intent, he's said, is to steer society away from the ‘judgment that we deserve,’ warning that otherwise the country will suffer not just from the effects of "bad policy and wicked rulers but under the Judgment of God."
7. Our nation is not a “democracy.” Never has been. We are “a republic if we can keep it,” to paraphrase Benjamin Franklin.
8. Yes. In love for God and others, I do want “to steer society away from the ‘judgment that we deserve.’”
Come to Christ so you will not “suffer the punishment of eternal destruction, away from the presence of the Lord and from the glory of his might, 10 when he comes on that day to be glorified in his saints, and to be marveled at among all who have believed, because our testimony to you was believed.” (2 Thessalonians 1:9-10)
RS: “He has introduced a bill to abolish the state income tax, which he claimed in a post on X, is “an unjust tax upon [a] man’s first fruits and livelihood,” suggesting it violates at least three of the Ten Commandments.”
GRAPHIC: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GFYiNRnWIAAtAWu?format=jpg&name=900x900
10. Thank you for including this.
11. Great ending!
12. Thank you for writing! All in all, a good piece.
In accordance with Genesis 50:20, God providentially, through the RS editor’s intention to defame Deevers and make him seem like a wacko fundamentalist, uses Rolling Stone Magazine to proclaim plain biblical truth and the gospel. This is the glory and grace of God to present the answer to sin right before the eyes of those who might not otherwise entertain the truth. Praise God for his sovereign grace!
The Way of Liberty vs. The Way of Bondage
Both Conservatives and Progressives say they are fighting for Liberty—and both are. So why do we not agree? Beneath the surface of this Cold Civil War between Americans and the Church is a particular motivation or spirit. Os Guinness calls this the difference between the Spirit of 1776 and the Spirit of 1789. Guinness breaks the difference down like this,
The Spirit of 1776 is “The Way of Liberty,” where the American Revolution defines Liberty as “Freedom FROM Tyrants.”
The Spirit of 1789 is “The Way of Bondage,” where the French Revolution, based on Enlightenment principles, defines Liberty as “Freedom TO DO” what thou wilt (my emphasis).
The Enlightenment played a significant and beneficial role in informing the Framers of the US Constitution. However, the difference between the foundational principles and the subsequent outcomes of the French and American Revolutions is crucial for understanding and explaining the fundamental error in the arguments of those who find Deevers’ sermon somehow “shocking.” What’s more shocking, a pastor calling Christian men to get off the couch and “be watchful, stand firm in the faith, act like men, be strong and let all that you do be done in love?” (1 Corinthians 16:13) Or is it shocking when someone calls for their fellow citizens to be silenced, censored, and eventually killed? If that seems harsh in out modern open text, I suggest a refresher on the Reign of Terror. This is the logical conclusion of bare Enlightenment principles.
The American and French Revolutions were both sparked by a common desire for liberation from oppressive rule. However, the drastic diversion of each revolution on the concept of supreme authority and the grounding of moral values is something we all must understand today. The American revolution which grounded human rights in God, resulted in the establishment of the freest nation in history. The French Revolution based on Enlightenment principles alone, placed human reason in the position of supreme authority, and resulted in the emergence of imperialism, dictatorship, and provided the justification for the execution of dissenters by something called the Committee of Public Safety.
The seeds of the Enlightenment were planted in Eve's heart at the time of the Fall. The serpent “was more crafty than any beast of the field.” The serpent was more sly, sensible, reasonable, and pragmatic than any other creature. He was crafty and slippery like a lawyer, and he asked Eve a leading question,
“Did God really say you shall not eat from ANY tree of the garden?”
In the second chapter of Genesis, we read what God really did say,
“From any tree of the garden, you may eat freely; but from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil you shall not eat, for in the day that you eat from it you will surely die” (Genesis 2:16-17)
Back in chapter 3, for whatever reason, whether it was Adam’s failure to disciple his wife well or whether Eve chose to lie, she did mischaracterize and add to God’s word when she said,
“From the fruit of the trees of the garden we may eat; but from the fruit of the tree which is in the middle of the garden, God has said, ‘You shall not eat from it or touch it, or you will die’” (Genesis 3:2-3).
The serpent said to the woman, “You surely will not die!
“For God knows that in the day you eat from it your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God, knowing good and evil” (Genesis 3:4-5)
Here is where the seeds of the so-called Enlightenment were planted,
“When the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was a delight to the eyes, and that the tree was desirable to make one wise, she took from its fruit and ate; and she gave also to her husband with her, and he ate. Then the eyes of both of them were opened, and they knew that they were naked; and they sewed fig leaves together and made themselves loin coverings.” (Genesis 3:6-7)
Of greatest significance is Eve’s sin of disobedience to a simple, straightforward command from God. Likewise, it’s no small matter that God’s design for leadership was flouted here as well, as Adam followed his wife’s lead into disobedience. But of particular concern in our current national discontent and disagreement over the source of law and human rights, is the distortion of true wisdom in Eve’s desire to be "wise" through self-reliance.
In the creation narrative, God established order setting a clear boundary for human obedience and trust in His provision and command. The serpent, vastly wiser than Adam, Eve, or any human creature since, challenges God’s command by twisting the truth and presenting an alternate pathway to enlightenment on par with God — disobedience.
There is a constant existential tension between humanity's dependence on God and the urge toward self-reliance. The serpent’s offer appeals to a deep-seated human longing for autonomy, or self-reliance. It’s a disordered ambition for a finite creature to seek equality with God. Leaning on our own understanding is one of our most common sins.
Seeking wisdom apart from the ground and foundation of truth is to assume oneself to be omniscient. However, wisdom, apart from the relational context of humility and dependence upon God, leads to spiritual and existential alienation. Many great church scholars have reflected on the nature of sin as a fundamental misordering of love toward the self and away from God—a disordered ambition.
It’s important to clarify that seeking wisdom and knowledge is not inherently sinful, the sin is rejecting a relational and dependent attitude toward God. Wisdom literature in the Bible describes “the fear of the Lord” as “the beginning of wisdom” (Proverbs 9:10). True wisdom, the foundation of understanding and insight, is inherently relational and grounded in the recognition of God’s sovereignty and goodness.
The First Amendment: Separation of Church and State?
The historical backdrop of the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment to the US Constitution is rooted in the European religious wars and persecutions of the 16th and 17th centuries. The framers of the American form of government were influenced by Enlightenment thinkers, the Protestant Reformation, and theological reflections of early church fathers such as Augustine and Aquinas. They envisioned a society where the state remains neutral in matters of religion, recognizing the inherent dangers of theocracy and the intertwining of governmental power with religious authority.
The Establishment Clause of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution declares,
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof."
The intent of the Establishment Clause serves a dual purpose. Firstly, it ensures the government does not favor one religion or single denomination over another, preventing any form of state-sponsored religion. Secondly, reflecting a commitment to religious pluralism, it protects the free exercise of diverse religious beliefs, allowing individuals and communities to practice their faiths openly and without fear of persecution from the state or its citizens. However, the
Establishment clause was never intended to suggest the absolute “separation of church and state,” or the outright rejection of religious values in the public domain as is so often argued today.
Defining Key Terms
Establishment Clause: A section of the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution that prohibits the federal government from making any law "respecting an establishment of religion."
Theocracy: A form of government in which a deity is recognized as the supreme civil ruler, and religious officials govern in the deity's name.
Civic Engagement: Active participation in the public life of a community in an informed, committed, and constructive manner, with a focus on the common good.
The Misconception:
Does Anyone Understand The Role of Faith in Civic Matters?
There are three vastly important points to grasp about the role of faith in society.
The Establishment Clause was never intended to mandate an absolute separation of God and state nor to preclude Christians from expressing their faith within the civic arena.
A state-enforced theocracy is a concept historically opposed by faithful Christians.
A thriving Christian church in society has consistently led to greater freedoms for all individuals. This is an empirical fact that no person can honestly refute.
That said, the Liberty enshrined in the US Constitution was not a freedom to do what thou wilt, but requires a specific vigilance to objective moral values and duties. As John Adams articulated,
“The U.S. Constitution was made only for a "moral and religious people" and is "wholly inadequate to the government of any other."
Adams underscores the expectation that citizens would engage in civic matters as informed by their moral and religious convictions.
Christianity's Historical Opposition to Theocracy
Christian doctrine has long resisted the idea of a theocracy. Augustine of Hippo, in his seminal work "City of God," distinguished between the earthly city and the city of God, arguing for a spiritual kingdom, not of this world. Martin Luther furthered this distinction through his doctrine of the two kingdoms, emphasizing that God rules the earthly kingdom through secular government and the heavenly kingdom through the gospel. These teachings solidify our theological foundation against theocratic rule and advocate for a system where Christians are free to live out their faith within a pluralistic society.
The Positive Impact of a Thriving Christian Church on Freedom
British Philosopher Roger Scruton noted that the Judeo-Christian value system is foundational to Western legal and ethical norms, which include the sanctity of life, the individual, the rule of law, and the separation of powers—all essential for a free society. Historical evidence supports the claim that a flourishing Christian church contributes to greater societal freedoms. The Reformation, for instance, led to the proliferation of the Bible in the vernacular, empowering individuals with direct access to Scripture and promoting literacy and education. This democratization of religious knowledge laid the groundwork for modern democratic principles and human rights.
What Did God Really Say?
The New Testament guides the Christian’s role in society. Romans 13:1-7 teaches respect for governmental authorities, emphasizing that all authority comes from God. However, this does not imply blind obedience, especially when laws contradict God's commandments (Acts 5:29). Instead, Christians are called to be salt and light (Matthew 5:13-16), influencing society by upholding godly values and principles.
Moreover, 1 Peter 2:13-17 encourages believers to "submit yourselves for the Lord’s sake to every human authority," not as a call to passivity, but as an active engagement in doing good as free people. This encapsulates the essence of Christian civic engagement—participation that seeks the city's welfare (Jeremiah 29:7), informed by a biblical worldview.
Conclusion
The misinterpretation of the Establishment Clause as a barrier between faith and the public sphere misrepresents the essence of the American founding principles and undermines the positive role that faith, particularly Christianity, plays in promoting liberty and justice. The clause's true purpose—to prevent a theocracy—aligns with the historical Christian stance against such a government structure. Far from advocating for a secular public square, history shows that a vibrant Christian presence in civic matters leads to greater freedoms for all. As Christians continue to engage in the public sphere, informed by their faith and guided by the wisdom of Scripture, they contribute to the flourishing and moral integrity of society
Soli Deo Gloria
WATCH ARMOR OF TRUTH’S FULL LENGTH SHOW BELOW
Sources and Citations:
Atheist, F. (2024, January 30). Oklahoma GOP lawmaker wants to ban single people from sexting each other. Friendly Atheist.
Bowman, C. G. (1979). Luther and the justifiability of resistance to legitimate authority. Journal of the History of Ideas, 40(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.2307/2709257
Dickinson, T. (2024, February 2). This lawmaker wants to jail people for watching porn. Rolling Stone. https://www.rollingstone.com/1234959499/
Koch, A., & Cappon, L. J. (1961). The Adams-Jefferson Letters: The Complete Correspondence between Thomas Jefferson and Abigail and John Adams. William and Mary Quarterly, 18(1), 126. https://doi.org/10.2307/1922811
ST. AUGUSTINE OF HIPPO, CITY OF GOD — Selections (XVI.VII–IX; XXI.VII–VIII). (2018). In Primary Sources on Monsters (pp. 55–60). https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvfxvckf.13 Storck, T. (2005).
The West and the Rest, by Roger Scruton. The Chesterton Review, 31(1), 160–165. https://doi.org/10.5840/chesterton2005311/268
Download the Armor of Truth Mobile App Free
Support the Armor of Truth Mission
Nihilism can't be defeated by tolerating it in a secular anarchy. MAGA 1607 to 1786 is the Christian theonomy answer. The nihilist hedonist degenerates are terrorized they might have to self-control their lusts; there is an answer for this. STAY IN YOUR BLUE CITIES AND STATES and party 'til you die. Have your feces, drug needles, homeless, drug drunk carshes, deaths, suicides etc. in your BLUE SODOMs. We, the MORAL, STOICAL have left or should leave ASAP for RED STATES and RED CITIES--voting with our feet. We reject Satanist nihilist hedonism and will wisely no longer co-exist with it.
Secular anarchy is not Biblical or workable. Deevers' FEDERAL 1st Amendment can't force someone to not cut their genitals off. Deevers is wrong about the BEST God/human government possible having drunk the Free Masonic, 1787 USC kool aid. He is also wrong on prisons which are not of God and yet another Amerika Babylonian hubris invention that doesn't work. The TRUTH is MAGA 1607 King James Bible town--for 180x years we were a Christian CONFEDERATION of colonies that didn't tolerate secret society saboteurs in their governments--until a 180 degree treason was done in Philadelphia that was supposed to upgrade the confederation not concoct a Satanist secular anarchy.