WHO “Pandemic Treaty” Actually A Global Venture Capital Proposal
“Sustainable” Financing: Former Deputy Director-General of the W.H.O. promises 35:1 return on investment for all contributing members
By Summer Black, Director, Armor of Truth
The video linked below is a meeting between Bjӧrn Kümmel, Chair of the WHO Sustainable Financing Working Group, and Jane Ellison, former WHO Deputy Director-General ahead of the 75th World Health Assembly meeting (May 2022). Their discussion included ideas about how to “convince” (coerce, rather) the people of the world to always be thinking about existential threats like climate change and pandemics. You’ll find interesting statements in that segment for sure. But the smoking gun, we believe you’ll agree, is found in the segment on Sustainable Financing (time-stamps under the video link). There you will hear first-hand, Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus’s deputy director promise at least a 35:1 return on investment for those who fund the WHO.
Dr. Tedros says,
“Our vision is not health for some. It’s not health for most. It’s health for all: rich and poor, able and disabled, old and young, urban and rural, citizen and refugee. Everyone, everywhere.”
Of course, we’d like to have the actual definition of “health” that Dr. Tedros is working from there, because it seems clear after the debacle of 2020 and beyond that the WHO is not fit to manage the funds of an 8-year old’s birthday party. Yet, we hear plainly revealed in this conversation, and in the subsequent report to the WHA75 that WHO intends to cloth itself with the power to both declare and profit from pandemics.
After WHA 75, Bjӧrn Kümmel, provided the following report.
Report by Mr Bjӧrn Kümmel, Chair of the WHO Sustainable Financing Working Group, to the Seventy-five World Health Assembly
“...WHO’s budget is 86% dependent on generous donors and only roughly 14% of WHO’s finances are truly predictable. This situation has put WHO at severe risk…
The challenge of sustainable financing has often been described as potentially the greatest historic challenge that WHO has been facing as an organization…
…there was a clear consensus in the working group, that the status quo of WHO’s financing is unacceptable.
This being said, it is with great pleasure that I am able to report to you, we reached a consensus… that if implemented, will certainly change the unacceptable status quo to the better.”
Mr. Kümmel discusses the financial challenges of the World Health Organization (WHO), emphasizing its heavy reliance on donations and the unpredictable nature of its budget. A working group has reached consensus on recommendations to improve this situation. One key recommendation Kümmel announced was the group’s proposal of a targeted increase in contributions and the exploration of new financing mechanisms. These changes aim to strengthen WHO's role in global health governance, making it more efficient, coordinated, and inclusive. The passage underscores the significance of these recommendations, viewing them as crucial for the future role of WHO and global health governance.
In short, Mr. Kümmel is announcing that WHO has decided to operate as a for profit organization while wielding a never-before seen level of power and control over its primary industry, pandemic products.
Bios of major players in the video (linked below):
Jane Ellison, (former) WHO Deputy Director-General:
60 years old - former British Conservative Party politician.
Former UN Civil servant
30 years experience in government, commerce, and “change management.”
2014 to 2016 UK Public Health Minister
October 2017 - appointed Deputy Director-General for Corporate Operations at the WHO
March 2019 - became Executive Director for External Relations and Governance at WHO.
November 2022 - left the WHO due to changes in senior leadership
2022 - Member of Steering Committee, World Health Summit (WHS)
Of Note: In March 2015, Ellison signed the Mitochondrial Donation Regulations, a procedure that uses mitochondrial DNA from a third party in the process of in vitro fertilization. The controversial procedure requires embryos to be created specifically for research and egg donors are financially compensated. Opponents argue that scientists are "playing God" and that children with three genetic parents may suffer both psychological and physical damage.
Björn Kümmel,
Senior political advisor on global health affairs in the German Federal Ministry of Health
Vice Chair of WHO Executive Board.
VIDEO: Final Countdown to WHA75: A Conversation About Sustainable Financing for WHO
Transcript of relevant quotes – Jane Ellison Speaking:
Time: 28:14
“The other piece that the member states will have sight of before they finish their deliberations next Wednesday is the updated WHO investment case. This is being produced for publication ahead of the (76th World Health Assembly in Geneva, May 21-30).
In 2018, we looked at the case for investing in WHO, and we commissioned a team of economists who produced a report independent of WHO, which essentially takes a number of existing rigorous studies of certain gains in global health across a range of subject areas.”
“And then it extrapolates from that a value of the organization as a whole, within the global health (market). And that we will be sharing with the member states [an] advanced draft copy… because we're still moving through a series of internal processes of sign off on that…”
Time 29:15
“But the really good news and the top line is that the figure that's emerged from that rigorous study is that for every dollar invested in WHO member states can see a $35 return. And this is quite a conservative ROI figure, we want to under-promise and over-deliver. …We've used, as I say, very sensible conservative models, but the economic modeling is extremely encouraging about what can be attributed to WHO and its value.”
Watch Armor of Truth’s Thursday, January 11th show with James Roguski for the latest updates on the Pandemic Agreement.
For your consideration, I have included the following article from the Rockefeller Foundation website. It seems to indicate that the push for lockdowns and control of resources and economies has been in play for many years and is being brought to fruition via the WHO.
Innovating for a Bold Future - The Rockefeller Foundation
https://www.rockefellerfoundation.org/blog/innovating-for-a-bold-future/
Zia Khan — Senior Vice President/Chief, Innovation, The Rockefeller Foundation
October 27, 2020
At The Rockefeller Foundation, we’ve always tried to stay one step ahead – imagining futures that inspire bold action and making catalytic bets that can lead to long-term change. As an institution deeply rooted in science and technology, we understand their transformational power to address today’s challenges – and help plan for those we haven’t yet envisioned.
In the 1930s, Warren Weaver, who led The Rockefeller Foundation’s programs in natural sciences, had a hunch that chemical and physical explanations of life would lead to a whole new world of research and discovery. He coined the term “molecular biology,” and a field was born.
In 1956, The Rockefeller Foundation supported the Dartmouth Summer Research Project on Artificial Intelligence, which was the first use of “artificial intelligence” as well. After some fits and starts, that field exploded, too.
And now, artificial intelligence has combined with molecular biology to accelerate the development of vaccines and therapeutics for the world’s worst pandemic since 1918.
Could any of this have been predicted? Absolutely not. However, both molecular biology and artificial intelligence were guided by visions of positive futures, where both fields contributed to improving people’s well-being.
Unfortunately, we must also plan for futures that aren’t as bright – be it due to a disease outbreak or natural disaster – to minimize harm and prepare for recovery.
(OPERATION LOCKSTEP)
In 2009, The Rockefeller Foundation conducted an exercise to explore the future of technology in development and identify ways to better respond to emerging challenges. The results were captured in a report that includes several plausible scenarios that could impact millions of people worldwide. One such scenario, “Lockstep,” described a fictional pandemic that would infect 20% of the world in 2012, killing eight million people in just seven months.
Now that we’re well into a real pandemic, we see some chilling similarities… The report predicted:
telepresence technologies would “respond to the demand for…communications systems for populations whose travel is restricted.”
Another part of Lockstep was research into MRI technologies for detecting abnormal behavior with anti-social intent.
While baseless posts have circulated recently calling the exercise part of a “diabolical plan for world domination,” we see it as further evidence of the importance of scenario planning in helping governments, institutions, and others navigate near-term decisions that can have long-term impacts.
WHAT’S UNIQUE ABOUT TODAY IS THAT THE FUTURE IS MORE OF A BLANK CANVAS THAN IT’S EVER BEEN. There are many reasons to worry that things will get worse. But there’s also reason to believe that leaders have a window to propose bold solutions that can reset our social, economic, and environmental systems to a much better ‘new normal.’
That’s why The Rockefeller Foundation is again making big bets on the future to ensure a more equitable return to ‘normal’ for all:
by reimagining how we grow, access, and consume food …to deliver sustainable, healthy diets for people and the planet by 2050.
To [reach our] reimagined future, we’re exploring how artificial intelligence can help reset the future while leveraging our network of experts to catalyze paradigm shifts for a “Great Reset” that helps accelerate progress toward the Sustainable Development Goals and beyond.
Countermeasure is a military term referring to the deployment of strategic actions intended to disrupt, deceive, and disable the target group. All excuses for ignoring the inconvenient fact that our governments have been captured by an enemy force were made void when the Pentagon organized and ran Operation Warp Speed and began referring to vaccines as “countermeasures.” Countermeasures typically involve sabotage or operations to disrupt or destroy the infrastructure and safety of a target group.
20th-century totalitarianism and its death toll of over 100 million lives had a lasting effect on the people of the world. We all know what it looks like. Jackboots, physical domination, and austerity “for the greater good.” The totalitarians of the new age know that most people are on the lookout for anything that outwardly resembles the ruling ideologies of Stalin, Hitler, Mao, Pol Pot, or the Kims. In order to achieve their goals in the 21st century, contemporary authoritarians realize that they must disguise their goals behind deceptive language, and appeals to existential fear. Therefore, the world is now saturated with repurposed terminology like “inclusivity” and “safety” as a new manufactured crisis seems to crop up almost daily. A decades-long design for defilement has traumatized the world leaving many people, like our closest family and friends either frozen in uncertainty or overwhelmed by apathy.
Behind the caring facade, what we are actually witnessing is the declaration of a superior worldview. The movement for control of all life on earth (and the earth itself) is much more than a push for global governance.
The WHO, The WEF, and all the rest of the Geneva Super Cult are declaring their autonomy and supremacy over every other governing body on earth and the One True Living Creator God. This attempts to concentrate the most influential individuals, organizations, and corporations into one purpose: control of the earth, all its resources, and creatures for “the common good.” This movement, which we are currently observing as it appropriates the WHO for its purposes, is solidifying into a stateless digital empire. Just as the Babelites concentrated wealth, power, and ingenuity in one city and tower complex to make a name for themselves or glorify mankind, a brotherhood of man, unified in Oneness to the exclusion of diversity and with a dogmatic commitment to this purpose, in other words, ultimately, this is not about money or power, this is a religious movement. Their purpose is to immanentize the eschaton, to build heaven on earth, a humanist Utopia. A global Communitarian order (therapeutic totalitarianism) is the logical conclusion of 5000 years of humanity groping for autonomy.
This movement will not be defeated by arguing for the glory of man. Libertarian principles will fail, anarchy will fail, and any argument that is founded on the principles of man’s sovereignty saying that man’s chief end is liberty, and that all people should be allowed to exert their free will over the earth because it promotes human flourishing, or well being will fail because that is their argument too, they just operate according to different definitions of sovereignty, liberty, freedom, man, woman, pandemic, etc… The classic Libertarian argument will fail because all you have is two tribes arguing about what OUGHT to be, but both have neither the rightful legal claim to rule autonomously nor the authority to redefine reality.
The only superior position and response to this is to start with the Living Creator God, and to declare that all humanity is created in His image for His glory, with the chief end of man being to praise God. That is the right approach, because that is the argument that is founded in eternal, unchanging truth, can be objectively shown to be true, can withstand all objections and challenges in the pubic square, and it's the only counter argument that has an objectively true and superior alternative to the world order they propose. Every claim they make is a moral claim. They must keep the world safe. Why? Because they think that is morality. They think they must control all the earth, and its creatures and rule over mankind in order to save the earth, and to ensure mankind’s evolutionary progress - to perfect mankind, and to perfect the earth, to avoid all risk, and to ultimately defeat death. They think this way because their corpus of truth is man made and is limited to that which man can achieve on his own power. Well, man cannot create anything. Man is not a creator, he is a creature. The reason they are so confused and the reason they will eventually fail at this attempt to concentrate human authority, wealth, enginuity, and intellect in one modern city and tower complex, one digital empire, is because, without the eternal, unchanging truth as your foundation, you are doomed to error. There is not a more logical defense of the Christian worldview and rebuke of the humanist worldview than that. It is actually very simple.
The only way to defend our lives is to found our lives upon eternal truth — truth that does not change, has never changed, and will never change. The only foundation you can trust.
We must begin with the image of God. Every human being possesses the image of God, and that must be the foundation, the underlying corpus of truth that gives our argument real force as a viable, defendable, truly righteous opposition to any tyranny, and is the only truly just standard by which man can practice self-government.
SILENCE IS CONSENT
In the American governmental system of Popular Sovereignty or "consent of the governed," the concept "silence is consent" implies that the absence of active opposition or vocal objection from the people can be interpreted as tacit approval or agreement with a particular action, operation, or policy. It suggests that if the general public remains silent or passive when decisions affecting their well-being are being made, their silence can be perceived as consent or acceptance of those decisions.
However, it is important to note that the concept of "silence is consent" is not universally accepted or legally binding. In a democratic system like the United States, the government derives its power from the consent of the governed, but that consent is typically understood as being expressed through formal processes such as voting, public input, or participation in civic affairs.
In the case of bad actors who seek to push through actions or policies that impact the well-being of the people in secret or without adequate public scrutiny, the concept of "silence is consent" may be viewed as an attempt to exploit the lack of awareness or active opposition. However, in a democracy, the principle of popular sovereignty emphasizes the importance of an engaged and informed citizenry, and it encourages people to actively voice their concerns, hold their representatives accountable, and participate in the decision-making process to ensure their well-being is protected.
Being made in God’s image is the only foundation from which any movement to stop such authoritarianism can be ultimately successful and lasting because it presents the only truly just alternative. Not just any “god.” We must argue for the sovereignty and supremacy of the only true and living God as the authority who establishes kingdoms and brings kingdoms down. It is only within this eternal context that we can find the proper platform from which to argue for the inherent worth and value of a person, emphasizing the right to be treated with respect and fairness. Being made in God’s image gives man inherent dignity, and is the only true worldview that can logically and ethically defeat this tyranny.
Soli Deo Gloria.
RESOURCES: ARTICLES & VIDEO CLIPS:
DRAFT Bureau’s text of the WHO CA+
WHO convention, agreement or other international instrument on pandemic prevention, preparedness and response (“WHO CA+”)
https://healthpolicy-watch.news/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/DRAFT_INB_Bureau-text_22-May.pdf
Article-by-Article Compilation of Proposed Amendments to the International Health Regulations (2005) submitted in accordance with decision WHA75(9) (2022)
https://apps.who.int/gb/wgihr/pdf_files/wgihr1/WGIHR_Compilation-en.pdf
GATEWAY PUNDIT | END OF AMERICAN SOVEREIGNTY:
Innovating for a Bold Future - The Rockefeller Foundation
https://www.rockefellerfoundation.org/blog/innovating-for-a-bold-future/
DOCUMENT: WHO ZERO DRAFT
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/wp-content/uploads/WHO-Zero-Draft.pdf
ROCKEFELLER: OPERATION LOCKSTEP
https://archive.org/details/the-annotated-rockefeller-foundation-lockstep-2010/page/n5/mode/2up
Download the Armor of Truth Mobile App Free
Help Support the Armor of Truth Mission Donate