Lex Libertas or Lex Technocratia?
The Christian face of globalist decentralization
At A Glance - What’s Happening?
Despite his courageous exposure of ANC tyranny and Marxist violence, Ernst Roets’ Lex Libertas project cloaks the very decentralization framework envisioned by the UN’s Agenda 2030. By invoking Calvinist virtue, stewardship, and the classical telos, Roets functions as a soft operator for stakeholder technocracy, offering a spiritualized on-ramp to the SDG order under the guise of local autonomy.
WATCH CLOSELY — the deception is next level, but we see through it. This isn’t isolated, either. It’s a trending narrative aimed at striking Western civilization to the ground for the final blow. Hear me out.
Ernst Roets’ decentralization rhetoric and Christian-Calvinist framing align with globalist SDG objectives, particularly under the guise of “autonomy,” “self-governance,” and “sustainability” — all markers of reflexive governance and technocratic stakeholder integration.
I used to follow Ernst Roets and appreciated his bold stance against the radical Marxist ANC in South Africa. I’ve written many articles about South Africa as a warning to America (see archive). But after listening closely to his latest interview—all the way to the end—my trained understanding of SDGs, decentralization rhetoric, and the UN’s self-sovereign identity (SSI) agenda picked up serious red flags. The rhetoric he’s using now isn’t that of a man resisting tyranny. It’s the language of someone aligning with it.
The Dangerous Confusion Between Dominionism and Biblical Christianity
The warnings from Courtenay Turner and Patrick Wood about the convergence of techno-authoritarianism, post-democratic theory, and Christian nationalism are timely, well-researched, and essential. Their critique of the rising technocratic religion—the synthesis of digital governance, therapeutic collectivism, and pseudo-Christian identity politics—deserv…
His talk of “sustainable solutions” and decentralization mirrors the very technocratic deception we’ve been warning about. It’s part of the same blueprint we see in Peter Thiel’s world—conservative and Christian language used to mask alignment with globalist goals like SDGs, self-sovereign identity, and stakeholder capitalism (which is really stakeholder sovietism).
While decentralization is often marketed as a means of empowering local communities, in global governance literature it frequently serves as a mechanism to bypass national sovereignty and integrate local systems into transnational regulatory frameworks. The United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), the World Economic Forum (WEF), and various Agenda 2030 documents frame decentralization as essential for implementing Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) using language of “autonomy,” “participation,” and “stakeholder engagement”1 to advance reflexive legal systems2 and digital identity infrastructure.3
Roets smirks as he describes South Africa as “ahead and not behind”—a subtle but telling remark. It comes across as a knowing nod to South Africa’s position, as a BRICS+ nation, on the frontlines of integration into the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) mainframe.
All who are genuinely committed to biblical freedom and true autonomy must scrutinize Roets’s language carefully, and press him for clear, unambiguous distinctions from the globalist technocratic agenda.
South Africa is a proud member of BRICS+ which is UN Charter/SDG compliant, even more so than the West.
I’ve warned many times that the BRICS bloc—not the West—is furthest along in adopting the UN Charter and embedding SDG infrastructure. Roets’s remark suggests he knows exactly where South Africa is headed—and it’s not toward biblical sovereignty, true national self-determination, or authentic decentralization.
We must watch Roets’s rhetoric very closely. Sad to say, but it appears he’s moving with Agenda 21 (the Great Reset)—not against it.
Red Flags and Globalist Convergence
Lex Libertas presents itself as a beacon of “Calvinist” resistance, but in reality would likely serve as a regional outpost of Technocratia—disguising global governance behind the language of self-rule.
Language of the SDGs Disguised in Anti-Marxist Rhetoric
Despite Roets' strong opposition to the ANC’s Marxist-nationalist tyranny, his proposed solution mirrors the global decentralization agenda laid out in SDG 16 (“inclusive institutions”) and SDG 11 (“sustainable communities”).
✅ Quotes:
“Lex Libertas… works towards achieving what we call a more sustainable political dispensation for South Africa.” (1:01:37)
“A system that is decentralized and… based on the principles of autonomy and self-governance.” (1:03:24)
These terms are verbatim from WEF/UN playbooks on localization, regional autonomy, and stakeholder governance. “Sustainable political dispensation” is a rhetorical reframing of SDG governance goals.
Micro-political / Macro-political Dialectic = Technocratic Design
Roets advocates a dual strategy of:
Micro-political reforms (policy within the system)
Macro-political redesign (system overhaul toward decentralization)
“The solution lies on a micropolitical and a macropolitical level... within the system... [and] toward a better political system...” (1:02:10–1:03:48)
This language exactly parallels UNDP, WEF, and G20 development planning which aims to soft-transition nation-states into multistakeholder, polycentric governance networks — i.e., the replacement of national sovereignty with globally harmonized local nodes.
Calvinism as Cultural Trojan Horse
Roets frames the Afrikaner Calvinist heritage as:
The root of stewardship, savings, and order
The natural antidote to Marxist destruction
Compatible with Western classical philosophy (telos, Aristotle, virtue ethics)
“The Afrikaner people are… predominantly Calvinist.” (5:32)
“Calvinism in short… work ethic, savings, and skills development.” (52:33)
“You don’t decide your purpose — you discover it. That’s both Christian and Aristotelian.” (8:49)
This fusion of Calvinism + classical tradition sounds biblical, but its functional deployment is ideological — building a cultural authority to justify political restructuring. Like Peter Thiel, he appears to use Calvinist language to baptize stakeholder-compatible reform.
Technocratic Decentralization in Christian Garb
Roets:
Frames decentralization as morally necessary and God-honoring
Claims “no one in South Africa actually has self-governance”
Casts centralization as inherently unworkable and Marxist
“No one in South Africa actually has self-governance… We have this big central government… It’s an oligarchy.” (1:03:34)
He offers no caution about the globalist hijacking of decentralization through digital ID, tokenized governance, or stakeholder councils. Like Thiel, he offers no theological warning about the Babylonian dimensions of this “freedom.”
Lex Libertas = Engineered Soft-Secession
The phrase “a more sustainable political dispensation” is key. Roets is not calling for biblical repentance or national reform rooted in divine law, but for a reconfiguration of state authority toward pluralistic, “autonomous” zones — a soft-secession model that mirrors United Nations localization tactics.
Compare to:
UN’s “Localization of the SDGs” model
WEF’s polycentric governance model
Atala PRISM’s micro-identities
EU’s Committee of the Regions model
This convergence is part of the Web of Trust, Self-Sovereign Identity (SSI) infrastructure, and Smart Governance framework.
The Web of Trust and Self-Sovereign Identity
The Lie of Digital Tyranny
The coming technocratic system is being built on concepts like Web of Trust and Self-Sovereign Identity (SSI). These promise decentralized freedom and privacy, but are actually tools of surveillance and social control. SSI will be used to gate access to work, health care, money, and even public life, based on your ideological conformity.
These Verified Claims in your digital ID will not reflect God’s righteousness but human-engineered morality. They will expose not that man is just and good, but rather that apart from Jesus Christ, men’s hearts are deceitfully wicked (Jer. 17:9).
SSI is not self-sovereignty, it’s slavery to the beast.
The Lie of Self-Sovereign Identity (SSI)
"Self-sovereign identity" sounds empowering, but it's really a digital performance identity were you are not who you are in Christ, you are who the system says you are, you are the sum total of verifiable digital claims, behavioral records, and social scores, recorded immutably on a blockchain ledger. "Trust" becomes a gamified system of compliance, and decentralization becomes a web of social enforcement.
They call it voluntary, until you can’t rent, buy, or travel without it.
The Dangerous Confusion Between Dominionism and Biblical Christianity
The warnings from Courtenay Turner and Patrick Wood about the convergence of techno-authoritarianism, post-democratic theory, and Christian nationalism are timely, well-researched, and essential. Their critique of the rising technocratic religion—the synthesis of digital governance, therapeutic collectivism, and pseudo-Christian identity politics—deserv…
The Archetype Pattern
Roets, like Peter Thiel and the ACTS 17 Collective, embodies a new archetype of globalist-compatible Christian conservatism. This model uses a Calvinist identity to legitimize authority, cultural heritage, and a sense of order against chaos. It blends classical and biblical language to appeal to Western intellectualism and moral virtue, creating the appearance of principled resistance.
Yet it often advances a false binary—opposing Marxism not with biblical frameworks, but with a globalist-friendly version of "freedom" aligned with SDG principles.
Its pro-decentralization rhetoric subtly steers audiences into stakeholder governance structures and digital identity frameworks. By invoking “sustainability,” it echoes SDG 16 (justice and institutions) and SDG 11 (inclusive communities), while its use of the “micro/macro” dialectic mirrors the design of reflexive law: fostering surface-level reforms while ushering in deeper systemic reordering under technocratic control.
The Moloch Machine: Silicon Valley's Decentralized Death Cult
Decentralized: The Shape of Tyranny to Come
The convergence of artificial intelligence, blockchain, and virtual reality has engendered a society increasingly comfortable with digital identities, relegating the physical and spiritual aspects of human existence to secondary concerns. While offering unprecedented connectivity, the digitization of identity risks reducing individuals to mere data points in a global network, stripping them of their God-given uniqueness and dignity.
The gamification of societal interactions transforms complex human experiences into quantifiable, manageable tasks and rewards, coercing a lifestyle where efficiency and productivity are prioritized over depth and meaning. This shift towards seeing life as a game to be won, with humans as players or pawns, reflects humanity's deeper desire, expressed in the Fall (Genesis 3:5), to assert control over chaos and uncertainty.
Is Roets SDG-aligned?
Yes — ideologically. His proposed solution is functionally indistinguishable from the decentralization and localization promoted in Agenda 2030 and WEF/UN systems.
Is he doing this knowingly?
Time will tell. But his use of Christian, Calvinist, and virtue language to promote decentralization that mirrors the global technocratic playbook makes him a high-value “trusted voice” asset — witting or unwitting.
The launch of Lex Libertas, led by Dr. Ernst Roets, presents itself as a bold initiative to restore “self-governance” to South African communities. However, beneath the surface, its language and structure align closely with globalist decentralization agendas framed by the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Roets explicitly calls for a “more sustainable political dispensation” and a strategic restructuring of governance toward “community-level autonomy” — rhetoric directly mirroring SDG 11 (inclusive, sustainable communities) and SDG 16 (justice and strong institutions). Lex Libertas’s promise to promote “alternative political models” and apply “strategic pressure for the decentralisation of the political order” fits within the reflexive law framework, where procedural decentralization enables global governance integration through local nodes. Despite Roets’ Calvinist credentials and apparent anti-Marxist stance, the institutional form and vocabulary — combining think tank advocacy, stakeholder engagement, and ideological realignment — suggest that Lex Libertas functions as a conservative on-ramp into the technocratic system.
Biblical Christianity stands in direct opposition to the UN’s global governance agenda, the Marxist ideology embedded within it, and the technocratic goals of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). These frameworks are not neutral—they are hostile to the gospel of Jesus Christ, promoting a false vision of salvation through collective compliance, managed “equity,” and human-centered utopias.
It is clear that global technocrats are not merely targeting political and economic systems—they are actively working to appropriate biblical Christianity itself, redefining theological terms and advancing counterfeit religious frameworks that serve their global agenda.
Just as Nelson Mandela was a carefully installed figurehead for Davos-aligned restructuring, Roets’s sustainability/decentralization rhetoric signals the next incoming phase of the Davos globalist technocratic install—this time cloaked in Reformed language and conservative aesthetics.
Mandela, Ramaphosa, and Schwab
In an explosive interview with Invisible Cities (see video below), South African molecular biologist Dr. Fahrie Hassan laid out a detailed case for how South Africa's so-called liberation from apartheid was not what it seemed. Rather than ushering in an era of true independence, the end of apartheid marked the beginning of a new form of capture, one dri…
To me, sadly, this podcast signals deeper ideological capture for South Africa and by extension, signals what’s coming for every Western nation riding the same train.
Christians must exercise vigilant discernment.
We are called not only to reject false ideologies, but also to recognize when biblical language is being co-opted to sanctify anti-Christian systems. Whether it’s through “sustainability,” “decentralization,” or “freedom,” many today are repackaging globalist governance goals in Christian-sounding terms. This convergence of faith and technocracy is subtle, but deadly.
The Gospel According to Silicon Valley
Verbatim from Sam Altman’s 2013 blog post How to Be Successful:
We must not be deceived. As Paul warns:
“Beware lest anyone cheat you through philosophy and empty deceit, according to the tradition of men, according to the basic principles of the world, and not according to Christ.” (Colossians 2:8)
This ideological convergence demands exposure and resistance lest sincere Christians unknowingly find themselves aligned with the very Beast system they thought they were opposing.
Summer Black, Director, Armor of Truth
Lex Libertas · Ernst Roets decentralization · Christian nationalism South Africa · stakeholder governance · sustainable political dispensation · SDG decentralization agenda · Technocratia · globalist-compatible conservatism · Calvinist identity politics · South Africa self-governance · technocratic governance · reflexive law · sustainable development deception · stakeholder sovietism · Christian language hijacked · UN Agenda 2030 exposure · soft secession model · controlled opposition in Christianity · Lex Libertas Ernst Roets SDG alignment · decentralization as globalist control · Christian framing used for UN goals · Appropriation of reformed theology and technocratic convergence · is decentralization part of Agenda 2030 · how SDGs infiltrate conservative movements
Stakeholder governance is the management model at the heart of the World Economic Forum’s “Great Reset” and Agenda 2030 implementation. It replaces representative government and private ownership models with multi-actor coalitions in which corporations, NGOs, governments, and civil society groups collectively shape policy and regulation. Though framed as participatory, it bypasses democratic accountability and installs technocratic rule through consensus-driven frameworks. This system is foundational to SDG-aligned initiatives such as ESG metrics, digital identity networks, and decentralized governance platforms. See Klaus Schwab and Peter Vanham, Stakeholder Capitalism: A Global Economy that Works for Progress, People and Planet (Hoboken: Wiley); World Economic Forum, Global Redesign Initiative: Every Sector, Every Actor, Every Region.
Reflexive law is a postmodern legal theory that shifts the role of law from enforcing fixed norms to facilitating procedural compliance and self-regulation within systems. It replaces clear legal prohibitions with guidelines that promote “learning,” “adaptation,” and “stakeholder feedback loops.” Originally developed in German legal theory by Gunther Teubner, reflexive law has been adopted by transnational governance bodies to soft-regulate behavior without legislative accountability, particularly in fields like environmental policy, education, and health. It underpins many Agenda 2030 compliance mechanisms.
See United Nations, Decentralized Governance and a Democratic Development State in Africa; World Economic Forum, Global Future Council on Agile Governance: Decentralization and Local Empowerment